Published September 2007 | Version v1
Journal article

A prospective randomized comparison between two MRI studies of the small bowel in Crohn's disease, the oral contrast method and MR enteroclysis

  • 1. Ullevaal University Hospital and Faculty of Medicine University of Oslo, Department of Radiology, Oslo (Norway)
  • 2. Ullevaal University Hospital, Department of Gastroenterology, Oslo (Norway)
  • 3. Ullevaal University Hospital and Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Department of Statistics and Epidemiology, Oslo (Norway)
  • 4. Rikshospitalet-Radiumhospitalet Medical Center, Department of Radiology, Oslo (Norway)
  • 5. Ullevaal University Hospital, Department of Pediatric Radiology, Oslo (Norway)
  • 6. Ullevaal University Hospital, Department of Medical Physics, Oslo (Norway)
  • 7. Ullevaal University Hospital and Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Department of Cardiovascular Radiology, Oslo (Norway)

Description

The aim was to compare bowel distension and diagnostic properties of magnetic resonance imaging of the small bowel with oral contrast (MRI per OS) with magnetic resonance enteroclysis (MRE). Forty patients with suspected Crohn's disease (CD) were examined with both MRI methods. MRI per OS was performed with a 6% mannitol solution and MRE with nasojejunal intubation and a polyethylenglycol solution. MRI protocol consisted of balanced fast field echo (B-FFE), T2 and T1 sequences with and without gadolinium. Two experienced radiologists individually evaluated bowel distension and pathological findings including wall thickness (BWT), contrast enhancement (BWE), ulcer (BWU), stenosis (BWS) and edema (EDM). The diameter of the small bowel was smaller with MRI per OS than with MRE (difference jejunum: 0.55 cm, p < 0.001; ileum: 0.35 cm, p < 0.001, terminal ileum: 0.09 cm, p = 0.08). However, CD was diagnosed with high diagnostic accuracy (sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values: MRI per OS 88%, 89%, 89%, 89%; MRE 88%, 84%, 82%, 89%) and inter-observer agreement (MRI per OS k = 0.95; MRE k = 1). In conclusion, bowel distension was inferior in MRI per OS compared to MRE. However, both methods diagnosed CD with a high diagnostic accuracy and reproducibility. (orig.)

Availability note (English)

Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-007-0648-4

Additional details

Identifiers

Publishing Information

Journal Title
European Radiology
Journal Volume
17
Journal Issue
9
Journal Page Range
p. 2294-2301
ISSN
0938-7994
CODEN
EURAE3

INIS

Country of Publication
Germany
Country of Input or Organization
Germany
INIS RN
38103064
Subject category
S62: RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE;
Descriptors DEI
COMPARATIVE EVALUATIONS; DIAGNOSIS; DIGESTIVE SYSTEM DISEASES; NMR IMAGING; SMALL INTESTINE
Descriptors DEC
BODY; DIAGNOSTIC TECHNIQUES; DIGESTIVE SYSTEM; DISEASES; EVALUATION; GASTROINTESTINAL TRACT; INTESTINES; ORGANS