Published November 2014 | Version v1
Journal article

Prediction of clinical outcome after stereotactic body radiotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer using diffusion-weighted MRI and 18F-FDG PET

  • 1. Department of Radiation Oncology and Image-applied Therapy, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto (Japan)
  • 2. Department of Diagnostic Imaging and Nuclear Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto (Japan)

Description

Highlights: • We evaluated DW-MRI and FDG-PET as prognostic factor for NSCLC treated with SBRT. • Lower ADC value was relevant to disease progression after SBRT. • Higher SUVmax was relevant to disease progression after SBRT. • Using both values in combination was a better predictor. - Abstract: Purpose/objectives: To evaluate the use of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DW-MRI) and 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) for predicting disease progression (DP) among patients with non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) treated with stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT). Materials/methods: Fifteen patients with histologically confirmed stage I NSCLC who underwent pre-treatment DW-MRI and PET and were treated with SBRT were enrolled. The mean apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) value and maximum standardised uptake value (SUVmax) were measured at the target lesion and evaluated for correlations with DP. Results: The median pre-treatment ADC value was 1.04 × 10−3 (range 0.83–1.29 × 10−3) mm2/s, and the median pre-treatment SUVmax was 9.9 (range 1.6–30). There was no correlation between the ADC value and SUVmax. The group with the lower ADC value (≤1.05 × 10−3 mm2/s) and that with a higher SUVmax (≥7.9) tended to have poor DP, but neither trend was statistically significant (p = 0.09 and 0.32, respectively). The combination of the ADC value and SUVmax was a statistically significant predictor of DP (p = 0.036). Conclusion: A low ADC value on pre-treatment DW-MRI and a high SUVmax may be associated with poor DP in NSCLC patients treated with SBRT. Using both values in combination was a better predictor

Availability note (English)

Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2014.07.018

Additional details

Identifiers

DOI
10.1016/j.ejrad.2014.07.018;
PII
S0720-048X(14)00392-1;

Publishing Information

Journal Title
European Journal of Radiology
Journal Volume
83
Journal Issue
11
Journal Page Range
p. 2087-2092
ISSN
0720-048X
CODEN
EJRADR

Optional Information

Copyright
Copyright (c) 2014 Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam, The Netherlands, All rights reserved.