Patterns and Timing of Recurrence After Temozolomide-Based Chemoradiation for Glioblastoma
Creators
- 1. Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY (United States)
- 2. Department of Neurology, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY (United States)
- 3. National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD (United States)
- 4. Department of Medicine, Division of Oncology, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY (United States)
- 5. Department of Neurosurgery, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY (United States)
- 6. Department of Pediatrics, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY (United States)
Description
Purpose: To determine recurrence patterns of glioblastoma treated with temozolomide-based chemoradiation. Methods: Pretreatment and serial posttreatment magnetic resonance imaging scans of 54 patients were retrospectively evaluated. Central recurrence (i.e., local progression) and the development of new (i.e., interval appearance of discrete enhancing lesion) in-field, marginal, and distant recurrences were assessed, with the pattern of recurrence of individual lesions defined relative to the 95% isodose line (D95). Distant recurrences were defined as lesions completely outside D95, marginal recurrences crossed D95, and in-field recurrences were completely inside D95. Results: At a median follow-up of 17 months, 39 of 54 (72%) patients developed recurrent glioblastoma. Among these 39 patients, central recurrence occurred in 80% (at a median of 7 months from diagnosis); new in-field recurrence developed in 33% (at a median of 14 months); marginal recurrences developed in 15% (at a median of 18 months); and distant recurrences developed in 20% (at a median of 11 months). The actuarial rates of central, new in-field, marginal, distant, and any new recurrences at 1-year were 46%, 15%, 3%, 14%, and 25% respectively, whereas at 2 years, the rates were 68%, 60%, 32%, 28%, and 66%, reflecting an increasing probability of new lesions developing at later time points. Ten patients developed subependymal recurrences, of whom 7 developed multiple subependymal lesions. Conclusions: Whereas central recurrence of glioblastoma treated with radiation and temozolomide predominates and persists over time, new in-field, marginal, and distant recurrences commonly develop, particularly at later time points in patients with longer survival.
Availability note (English)
Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.09.018Additional details
Identifiers
- DOI
- 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.09.018;
- PII
- S0360-3016(09)03211-8;
Publishing Information
- Journal Title
- International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology and Physics
- Journal Volume
- 78
- Journal Issue
- 4
- Journal Page Range
- p. 1147-1155
- ISSN
- 0360-3016
- CODEN
- IOBPD3
INIS
- Country of Publication
- United States
- Country of Input or Organization
- International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
- INIS RN
- 42034034
- Subject category
- S62: RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE;
- Descriptors DEI
- GLIOMAS; NMR IMAGING; RADIOTHERAPY
- Descriptors DEC
- DIAGNOSTIC TECHNIQUES; DISEASES; MEDICINE; NEOPLASMS; NERVOUS SYSTEM DISEASES; NUCLEAR MEDICINE; RADIOLOGY; THERAPY
Optional Information
- Copyright
- Copyright (c) 2010 Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam, The Netherlands, All rights reserved.