Published September 2021 | Version v1
Journal article

Using MAXFEA code in combination with ANSYS APDL for the simulation of plasma disruption events on EU DEMO

  • 1. Department of Economics, Engineering, Society and Business Organization (DEIM), University of Tuscia, Largo dell'Università, Viterbo, 01100 (Italy)
  • 2. ENEA, Department of Fusion and Nuclear Safety Technology, I-00044 Frascati (Rome) (Italy)

Description

Highlights: • Electromagnetic evaluation of the loads coming from a plasma disruption event on EU DEMO vacuum vessel. • MAXFEA 2D axisymmetric plasma equilibrium and evolution simulation of the disruption used in combination with ANSYS APDL 3D code. • Plasma poloidal field variation and toroidal field variation introduced inside ANSYS APDL by means a set of filaments and a thin rectangular torus, respectively. • Evaluation of the induced eddy currents and related force distributions on the vacuum vessel. Plasma disruptions are one of the major concerns in the design phase of fusion devices. The very high eddy and Halo currents, induced in the passive structures, crossing the electromagnetic field generate huge loads. A Vertical Displacement Event (VDE) begins with a loss of position control that could be triggered by a plasma perturbation (e.g. ELMs, L-H and H-L transitions, minor disruptions, etc.) acting as a source of vertical and horizontal plasma displacements. At a certain point a fast Thermal Quench (TQ) takes place. After that the plasma current abruptly decreases (Current Quench (CQ) phase). During the plasma evolution, especially during the TQ and CQ, toroidal and poloidal eddy currents are induced in the metallic components, respectively due to the dynamic effect of plasma Poloidal Field Variation (PFV) and Toroidal Field Variation (TFV). The plasma time evolution and the effects of such events on the passive structures can estimated through 2D axisymmetric codes, such as MAXFEA. However, the presence of 3D structures (e.g. ports, divertor, etc.) generates non-trivial currents paths and distribution of EM loads. In order to estimate the 3D effects, MAXFEA has been used in combination with ANSYS APDL code, allowing to estimate both PFV and TFV consequences on the 3D model. Considering the DEMO PMI configuration and a fast upper Vertical Displacement Event (VDE), the procedure was successfully benchmarked, comparing the MAXFEA and APDL results, in a case where the 3D Vacuum Vessel (VV) was considered axisymmetric. The methodology has been then exploited and applied to estimate the EM load distribution on the real DEMO VV.

Availability note (English)

Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fusengdes.2021.112697

Additional details

Identifiers

DOI
10.1016/j.fusengdes.2021.112697;
PII
S0920379621004737;

Publishing Information

Journal Title
Fusion Engineering and Design
Journal Volume
170
Journal Page Range
vp.
ISSN
0920-3796
CODEN
FEDEEE

Optional Information

Copyright
Copyright (c) 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.