Published June 2008 | Version v1
Journal article

Economic and energy impacts from participation in the regional greenhouse gas initiative: A case study of the State of Maryland

  • 1. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, A. James Clark School of Engineering, University of Maryland, MD (United States)
  • 2. Environmental Policy Program, School of Public Policy, University of Maryland, MD (United States)
  • 3. Center for Integrative Environmental Research, Division of Research, University of Maryland, 2101 Van Munching Hall, College Park, MD 20742 (United States)
  • 4. Applied Mathematics and Scientific Computation Program, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland, MD (United States)
  • 5. Resources for the Future, Washington, DC (United States)
  • 6. School of Engineering, Social Sciences, Humanities and Arts, University of California, Merced, CA (United States)
  • 7. Department of Geography and Environmental Engineering, Whiting School of Engineering, The Johns Hopkins University, MD (United States)
  • 8. Regional Economic Studies Institute, Towson University, Towson, Maryland, MD (United States)
  • 9. Eberhardt School of Business, University of the Pacific, Stockton, CA (United States)

Description

Tradable emissions allowance systems to reduce carbon emissions are increasingly promoted as means to mitigate climate change. This paper briefly reviews the application of such systems at the global, regional, and corporate scales. Given the recent expansion of cap-and-trade systems at the regional level, the paper concentrates on energy and economic implications at that level, using the decision of the State of Maryland, USA, to join the Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative as an illustration. The paper presents the results of an analysis of the implications for technology choice, generation capacity, energy reliability, and cost to ratepayers of that decision, combining a national electricity market model with a regional model that includes market power and an economic impact model. The results suggest several issues that will be key to the acceptability and effectiveness of cap-and-trade systems for regional climate change mitigation policy, including rules for distribution of allowances and subsidies for energy efficiency programs. (author)

Availability note (English)

Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2008.03.012

Additional details

Identifiers

Publishing Information

Journal Title
Energy Policy
Journal Volume
36
Journal Issue
6
Journal Page Range
p. 2279-2289
ISSN
0301-4215
CODEN
ENPYAC

INIS

Country of Publication
United Kingdom
Country of Input or Organization
United Kingdom
INIS RN
39083006
Subject category
S29: ENERGY PLANNING, POLICY AND ECONOMY;
Descriptors DEI
CARBON; CLIMATIC CHANGE; COST; ENERGY EFFICIENCY; FINANCIAL INCENTIVES; GREENHOUSE GASES; MARYLAND; TRADE
Descriptors DEC
DEVELOPED COUNTRIES; EFFICIENCY; ELEMENTS; NONMETALS; NORTH AMERICA; USA

Optional Information

Notes
Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved