Does hydrothermal carbonization as a biomass pretreatment reduce fuel segregation of coal-biomass blends during oxidation?
Creators
- 1. The John and Willie Leone Family Department of Energy & Mineral Engineering, The EMS Energy Institute, Penn State Institutes of Energy & the Environment, The Pennsylvania State University, Hosler Building, University Park, PA 16802 (United States)
- 2. School of Chemical Engineering and Technology, China University of Mining and Technology, No.1 Daxue Road, Xuzhou 221116, People's Republic of (China)
- 3. Department of Mechanical Engineering, Boston University, 110 Cummington Mall, Boston, MA 02215 (United States)
- 4. The Pardee Center for the Study of the Longer-Range Future, Boston University, Bay State Road, Boston, MA 02215 (United States)
- 5. Department of Civil, Environmental and Mechanical Engineering, University of Trento, via Mesiano 77, 38123 Trento (Italy)
- 6. Department of Biological and Environmental Engineering, Cornell University, 226 Riley-Robb Hall, Ithaca, NY 14853 (United States)
Description
Highlights: • Hydrochars have "coal-like" composition and HHV, but higher oxidative reactivity. • Higher reactivity partially due to secondary char deposited on hydrochar surface. • Blends of hydrochars and Illinois No. 6 coal show segregation during oxidation. • Segregation partially reduced by removing secondary char deposits. -- Abstract: Co-firing of biomass and coal may increase short-term renewable fuel usage. However, the lower heating value and higher reactivity (at lower temperatures) of raw biomass can result in fuel segregation in boilers, causing burnout at lower temperatures, lower steam generation efficiency and fouling. In addition, the relatively high water content of some biomasses requires extensive drying prior to combustion. These issues may be addressed by hydrothermally carbonizing moist biomasses to produce hydrochars that more closely resemble coal's properties prior to co-firing. In the present work, we probe the co-oxidation behavior of a series of hydrothermally carbonized biomass samples over a range of hydrochar-coal blend ratios to determine the degree of carbonization necessary to reduce fuel segregation. However, due to the presence of an extractable amorphous secondary char, even highly carbonized hydrochars have considerably higher oxidative reactivity than a representative bituminous coal sample. When blended, the hydrochars and coal display distinct derivative thermogravimetric oxidation ranges, in which a low-temperature peak is dominated by the secondary char oxidation, followed by a high-temperature char oxidation peak of the primary solid hydrochar. After extraction of the secondary char, the primary char displays a lower reactivity than the coal. As a co-fired fuel, it appears that blending hydrochars up to 10 wt% with a bituminous coal is possible as a partial fuel substitution. To increase the percentage of hydrochars blended with coal, it may be necessary to extract this secondary char (which contains valuable biofuels and platform chemicals) before blending.
Additional details
Identifiers
- DOI
- 10.1016/j.enconman.2018.12.009;
- PII
- S0196890418313402;
Publishing Information
- Journal Title
- Energy Conversion and Management
- Journal Volume
- 181
- Journal Page Range
- p. 93-104
- ISSN
- 0196-8904
- CODEN
- ECMADL
INIS
- Country of Publication
- United Kingdom
- Country of Input or Organization
- International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
- INIS RN
- 55005377
- Subject category
- S01: COAL, LIGNITE, AND PEAT; S09: BIOMASS FUELS;
- Descriptors DEI
- BIOFUELS; BIOMASS; BITUMINOUS COAL; BOILERS; BURNOUT; CARBONIZATION; CHARS; DRYING; FUEL SUBSTITUTION; STEAM GENERATION; SURFACES; THERMAL GRAVIMETRIC ANALYSIS
- Descriptors DEC
- ALTERNATIVE FUELS; BLACK COAL; CARBONACEOUS MATERIALS; CHEMICAL ANALYSIS; CHEMICAL REACTIONS; COAL; DECOMPOSITION; ENERGY SOURCES; FOSSIL FUELS; FUELS; GRAVIMETRIC ANALYSIS; MATERIALS; PYROLYSIS PRODUCTS; QUANTITATIVE CHEMICAL ANALYSIS; RENEWABLE ENERGY SOURCES; THERMAL ANALYSIS
Optional Information
- Copyright
- Copyright (c) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.