Published August 2012 | Version v1
Journal article

Quantitative assessment of first-pass perfusion using a low-dose method at multidetector CT in oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma: Correlation with VEGF expression

  • 1. Department of Radiology, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, 37 Guo Xue Xiang, Chengdu, Sichuan 610041 (China) and Sichuan Province Key Laboratory of Medical Imaging and Department of Radiology, Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College, 63 Wen Hua Lu, Nanchong, Sichuan 637000 (China)
  • 2. State Key Laboratory of Biotherapy, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, 37 Guo Xue Xiang, Chengdu, Sichuan 610041 (China)
  • 3. Department of Radiology, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, 37 Guo Xue Xiang, Chengdu, Sichuan 610041 (China)
  • 4. Department of Pathology, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, 37 Guo Xue Xiang, Chengdu, Sichuan 610041 (China)

Description

Aim: To investigate the correlation between vascular endothelial cell growth factor (VEGF) expression and first-pass perfusion parameters at multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) using a low-dose technique, and to determine how to discriminate VEGF positivity from VEGF negativity by perfusion CT in oesophageal squamous cell carcinomas. Materials and methods: Thirty-two patients with oesophageal squamous cell carcinomas underwent first-pass perfusion with 64-section MDCT at 50 mAs. Perfusion parameters, including perfusion, peak enhanced density (PED), time to peak (TTP), and blood volume (BV), were measured. Postoperative specimens were assessed for VEGF expression. Correlation tests were performed to determine the associations between each CT perfusion parameter and VEGF expression. The cut-off values of perfusion parameters were obtained statistically to discriminate VEGF positivity from VEGF negativity. Results: Mean perfusion, PED, TTP, and BV were 38.47 ± 30.26 ml/min/ml, 24.68 ± 9.65 HU, 28.35 ± 9.03 s, and 11.82 ± 6.06 ml/100 g, respectively. PED or BV were significantly higher in the VEGF-positive group than in the VEGF-negative group (all p < 0.05), but no significant difference in perfusion or TTP was found between the VEGF-positive and VEGF-negative groups (all p > 0.05). In VEGF positivity, PED and BV were correlated with VEGF expression (r = 0.576 and 0.765, respectively; all p < 0.05), whereas perfusion and TTP were not (r = 0.361 and 0.239, respectively; all p > 0.05). A threshold of BV (10.23 ml/100 g) achieved a sensitivity of 94.4%, and a specificity of 92.9% for discriminating VEGF positivity from VEGF negativity. Conclusion: BV could reflect tumour VEGF expression, and could be an indicator for evaluating angiogenesis in oesophageal tumours.

Availability note (English)

Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.crad.2011.07.053

Additional details

Identifiers

DOI
10.1016/j.crad.2011.07.053;
PII
S0009-9260(12)00035-9;

Publishing Information

Journal Title
Clinical Radiology
Journal Volume
67
Journal Issue
8
Journal Page Range
p. 746-753
ISSN
0009-9260
CODEN
CLRAAG

INIS

Country of Publication
United Kingdom
Country of Input or Organization
International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
INIS RN
43073219
Subject category
S62: RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE;
Descriptors DEI
ANGIOGENESIS; BLOOD; CARCINOMAS; COMPUTERIZED TOMOGRAPHY; GROWTH FACTORS; PATIENTS; RADIATION DOSES; SENSITIVITY; SPECIFICITY
Descriptors DEC
BIOLOGICAL MATERIALS; BODY FLUIDS; DIAGNOSTIC TECHNIQUES; DISEASES; DOSES; MATERIALS; MITOGENS; NEOPLASMS; ORGANIC COMPOUNDS; PROTEINS; TOMOGRAPHY

Optional Information

Copyright
Copyright (c) 2012 Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam, The Netherlands, All rights reserved.