Published August 1984
| Version v1
Journal article
Who pays for radioactive rubbish
Creators
Description
A generic defect in federal nuclear power regulation has been the failure to establish institutional arrangements to fund the fuel cycle's economic externalities caused by the generation of radioactive byproducts that must be managed, stored, and guarded. Case histories involving uranium mill tailings, decommissioning, and low-level waste illustrate the economic problems. Long-term costs from the nuclear fuel cycle will be large and inflationary. A fair versus a lassez-faire economic system would have followed a different route. Consumers must either see that regulatory bodies require escrow funds to meet these costs before the industry goes under, or the funding can be left to chance and future generations. 26 references
Additional details
Publishing Information
- Journal Title
- Bull. At. Sci.
- Journal Volume
- 40
- Journal Issue
- 7
- Series
- Bull. At. Sci.
- Journal Page Range
- 24-28
- ISSN
- 0096-5243
INIS
- Country of Publication
- United States
- Country of Input or Organization
- United States
- INIS RN
- 16065066
- Subject category
- S12: MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE WASTES, AND NON-RADIOACTIVE WASTES FROM NUCLEAR FACILITIES; S29: ENERGY PLANNING, POLICY AND ECONOMY;
- Descriptors DEI
- FUEL CYCLE; LOW-LEVEL RADIOACTIVE WASTES; NUCLEAR INDUSTRY; NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS; ORE PROCESSING; RADIOACTIVE WASTES; REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING; REGULATIONS; SOCIO-ECONOMIC ASPECTS; SOLID WASTES; TAILINGS; WASTE MANAGEMENT
- Descriptors DEC
- DECOMMISSIONING; INDUSTRY; LAW; MANAGEMENT; MATERIALS; NUCLEAR FACILITIES; POWER PLANTS; RADIOACTIVE MATERIALS; THERMAL POWER PLANTS; WASTES