Published 2023 | Version v1
Journal article

A prospective comparative study of [68Ga]Ga-RM26 and [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-617 PET/CT imaging in suspicious prostate cancer

  • 1. Department of Pathology, Disorders of Prostate Cancer Multidisciplinary Team, National Clinical Research Center for Geriatric Disorders, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Hunan Province, No.87 Xiangya Road, 410008, Changsha City (China)
  • 2. Department of Nuclear Medicine, Disorders of Prostate Cancer Multidisciplinary Team, National Clinical Research Center for Geriatric Disorders, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Hunan Province, No.87 Xiangya Road, 410008, Changsha City (China)
  • 3. Department of Urology, Disorders of Prostate Cancer Multidisciplinary Team, National Clinical Research Center for Geriatric Disorders, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Hunan Province, No.87 Xiangya Road, 410008, Changsha City (China)
  • 4. Key Laboratory of Biological, Nanotechnology of National Health Commission, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Hunan Province, No.87 Xiangya Road, 410008, Changsha City (China)

Description

Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-based PET/CT imaging has limitations in the diagnosis of prostate cancer (PCa). We recruited 207 participants with suspicious PCa to perform PET/CT imaging with radiolabeled gastrin-releasing peptide receptor (GRPR) antagonist, [68Ga]Ga-RM26, and compare with [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-617 and histopathology. Every participant with suspicious PCa was scanned with both [68Ga]Ga-RM26 and [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-617 PET/CT. PET/CT imaging was compared using pathologic specimens as a reference standard. Of the 207 participants analyzed, 125 had cancer, and 82 were diagnosed with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). The sensitivity and specificity of [68Ga]Ga-RM26 and [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-617 PET/CT imaging differed significantly for detecting clinically significant PCa. The area under the ROC curve (AUC) was 0.54 for [68Ga]Ga-RM26 PET/CT and 0.91 for [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-617 PET/CT in detecting PCa. For clinically significant PCa imaging, the AUCs were 0.51 vs. 0.93, respectively. [68Ga]Ga-RM26 PET/CT imaging had higher sensitivity for PCa with Gleason score (GS) = 6 (p = 0.03) than [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-617 PET/CT but poor specificity (20.73%). In the group with PSA < 10 ng/mL, the sensitivity, specificity, and AUC of [68Ga]Ga-RM26 PET/CT were lower than [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-617 PET/CT (60.00% vs. 80.30%, p = 0.12, 23.26% vs. 88.37%, p = 0.000, and 0.524 vs. 0.822, p = 0.000, respectively). [68Ga]Ga-RM26 PET/CT exhibited significantly higher SUVmax in specimens with GS = 6 (p = 0.04) and in the low-risk group (p = 0.01), and its uptake did not increase with PSA level, GS, or clinical stage. This prospective study provided evidence for the superior accuracy of [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-617 PET/CT over [68Ga]Ga-RM26 PET/CT in detecting more clinically significant PCa. [68Ga]Ga-RM26 PET/CT showed an advantage for imaging low-risk PCa.

Availability note (English)

Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00259-023-06142-2

Additional details

Identifiers

Publishing Information

Journal Title
European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging
Journal Volume
50
Journal Issue
7
Journal Page Range
p. 2177-2187
ISSN
1619-7070
CODEN
EJNMA6

Optional Information

Notes
Oncology #En Dash# Genitourinary