Published May 2020 | Version v1
Journal article

Inter- and intra-reader reproducibility of shear wave elastography measurements for musculoskeletal soft tissue masses

  • 1. Musculoskeletal Centre X-Ray Department, Leeds Teaching Hospitals Trust, Chapel Allerton Hospital, Leeds (United Kingdom)
  • 2. Radiology and Medical Imaging Department, College of Applied Medical Sciences, Prince Sattam bin Abdulaziz University, Kharj (Saudi Arabia)
  • 3. Leeds Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine, Chapel Allerton Hospital, University of Leeds (United Kingdom)
  • 4. NIHR Leeds Biomedical Research Centre, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds (United Kingdom)

Description

To determine inter- and intra-reader reproducibility of shear wave elastography measurements for musculoskeletal soft tissue masses. In all, 64 patients with musculoskeletal soft tissue masses were scanned by two readers prior to biopsy; each taking five measurements of shear wave velocity (m/s) and stiffness (kPa). A single lesion per patient was scanned in transverse and cranio-caudal planes. Depth measurements (cm) and volume (cm3) were recorded for each lesion, for each reader. Linear mixed modelling was performed to assess limits of agreement (LOA), inter- and intra-reader repeatability, including analyses for measured depth and volume. Of the 64 lesions scanned, 24 (38%) were malignant. Bland-Altman plots demonstrated negligible bias with wide LOA for all measurements. Transverse velocity was the most reliable measure - intraclass correlation (95% CI) = 0.917 (0.886, 1) - though reader 1 measures could be between 38% lower and 57% higher than reader 2 [ratio-scale bias (95% LOA) = 0.99 (0.64, 1.55)]. Repeatability coefficients indicated most disagreement resulted from poor within-reader reproducibility. LOA between readers calculated from means of five repeated measurements were narrower - transverse velocity ratio-scale bias (95% LOA) = 1.00 (0.74, 1.35). Depth affected both estimated velocity and repeatability; volume also affected repeatability. This study found poor repeatability of measurements with wide LOA due mostly to intra-reader variability. Transverse velocity was the most reliable measure; variability may be affected by lesion depth. At least five measurements should be reported with LOA to assist future comparability between shear wave elastography systems in evaluating soft tissue masses.

Availability note (English)

Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00256-019-03300-2

Additional details

Identifiers

Publishing Information

Journal Title
Skeletal Radiology
Journal Volume
49
Journal Issue
5
Journal Page Range
p. 779-786
ISSN
0364-2348
CODEN
SKRADI

INIS

Country of Publication
Germany
Country of Input or Organization
Germany
INIS RN
51064928
Subject category
S62: RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE;
Descriptors DEI
BIOPSY; CONNECTIVE TISSUE; CORRELATIONS; ELASTICITY; MEASURING METHODS; MUSCLES; RELIABILITY; SKELETAL DISEASES; ULTRASONOGRAPHY; YOUNG MODULUS
Descriptors DEC
ANIMAL TISSUES; BODY; DIAGNOSTIC TECHNIQUES; DISEASES; MECHANICAL PROPERTIES