Impact of ELM mitigation on the ITER monoblock thermal behavior and the tungsten recrystallization depth

Highlights: • The ITER monoblock is analyzed numerically under repeated mitigated ELM heat loads. • An empirical heat load model is developed for mitigated ELMs using Eich's scaling. • ELM mitigation techniques increase the time-averaged peak heat load. • A novel recrystallization budget limits the permissible ELM mitigation frequency. Type I Edge Localized Modes (ELMs) occur naturally in H-mode plasmas, the operational regime envisaged for ITER, and lead to high temporal heat load peaks on plasma-facing components that might induce surface melting and deteriorated material properties due to recrystallization. ELM mitigation techniques are being developed that either attempt to fully suppress the ELM, e.g. using resonant magnetic perturbations (RMP), or to trigger the ELM at higher frequencies, intending to reduce its energy content and hence the heat load peak. In this paper, the effect of the increased ELM frequency achieved by ELM mitigation techniques on the ITER tungsten divertor monoblock thermal and recrystallization behavior is numerically analyzed by solving the unsteady heat conduction equation when repeatedly exposing the monoblock to ELM-like heat loads under ITER baseline burning plasma operating conditions. The impinging heat load is based on a set of empirical relations readily found in literature and the recrystallization fraction is computed using an empirical data fit which is based on the non-isothermal JMAK equation as function of temperature and time. Uncertainties such as the statistical spread on empirical relations and the unknown inter-ELM heat load, as well as the effect of the ELM frequency, are quantified by a parameter scan. Adopting the recently developed concept of a 'recrystallization budget' to determine the allowed monoblock heat loads [G. De Temmerman et al., PPCF 60 (2018) 0044018], it was found that ELM frequencies between 25 – 50 Hz are allowed for inter-ELM heat loads between 9 – 6 MW m${}^{-2}$ , respectively, when assuming that the scaling for the peak ELM target energy density in [T. Eich et al., NME 12 (2017) 84-90] holds. This provides a new limit for ELM mitigation strategies in ITER.