ACR Appropriateness Criteria Retreatment of Recurrent Head and Neck Cancer After Prior Definitive Radiation
Creators
- 1. Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana (United States)
- 2. University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California (United States)
- 3. Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, New York (United States)
- 4. University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania (United States)
- 5. Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania and American College of Surgeons (United States)
- 6. Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia and American Society of Clinical Oncology (Georgia)
- 7. Duke University, Durham, North Carolina (United States)
- 8. Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, New York and American College of Surgeons (United States)
- 9. University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida (United States)
- 10. University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California (United States)
- 11. Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia (United States)
Description
Recurrent and second primary head-and-neck squamous cell carcinomas arising within or in close proximity to previously irradiated fields are a common clinical challenge. Whereas surgical salvage therapy is recommended for resectable disease, randomized data support the role of postoperative reirradiation in high-risk patients. Definitive reirradiation is an established approach for patients with recurrent disease who are medically or technically inoperable or decline radical surgery. The American College of Radiology Expert Panel on Head and Neck Cancer reviewed the relevant literature addressing re-treatment after prior definitive radiation and developed appropriateness criteria for representative clinical scenarios. Examples of unresectable recurrent disease and microscopic residual disease after salvage surgery were addressed. The panel evaluated the appropriateness of reirradiation, the integration of concurrent chemotherapy, radiation technique, treatment volume, dose, and fractionation. The panel emphasized the importance of patient selection and recommended evaluation and treatment at tertiary-care centers with a head-and-neck oncology team equipped with the resources and experience to manage the complexities and toxicities of re-treatment.
Availability note (English)
Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2011.02.014Additional details
Identifiers
- DOI
- 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2011.02.014;
- PII
- S0360-3016(11)00247-1;
Publishing Information
- Journal Title
- International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology and Physics
- Journal Volume
- 80
- Journal Issue
- 5
- Journal Page Range
- p. 1292-1298
- ISSN
- 0360-3016
- CODEN
- IOBPD3
INIS
- Country of Publication
- United States
- Country of Input or Organization
- International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
- INIS RN
- 43066017
- Subject category
- S62: RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE;
- Descriptors DEI
- CARCINOMAS; CHEMOTHERAPY; EVALUATION; FRACTIONATION; HEAD; NECK; RADIATION DOSES; RADIOTHERAPY; SURGERY
- Descriptors DEC
- BODY; DISEASES; DOSES; MEDICINE; NEOPLASMS; NUCLEAR MEDICINE; RADIOLOGY; SEPARATION PROCESSES; THERAPY
Optional Information
- Copyright
- Copyright (c) 2011 Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam, The Netherlands, All rights reserved.