Institutional impediments to conservation of freshwater dependent ecosystems
Creators
- 1. School of Ecosystem and Forest Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria 3010 (Australia)
- 2. School of Biological Sciences, Monash University, Victoria 3800 (Australia)
- 3. The Murray-Darling Freshwater Research Centre, La Trobe University, Wodonga 3690, Victoria (Australia)
- 4. Institute for Applied Ecology, The University of Canberra, ACT 2617 (Australia)
- 5. School of Life and Environmental Sciences, Deakin University, Burwood, Victoria 3125 (Australia)
- 6. Centre of Excellence for Biosecurity Risk Analysis, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria 3010 (Australia)
Description
Highlights: • Regulation of river flows with reservoirs threatens many of the world's floodplain ecosystems. • The decline of aquatic and floodplain ecosystems has motivated programs that return more water to the environment. • In Australia's Murray-Darling Basin billions are being spent to return water to aquatic and floodplain ecosystems, managed by environment water holders. • Recovery of floodplain forests by releasing water from reservoirs during periods of high flow is undermined by restrictions on river operations. • Expensive water recovery programs can fail to achieve conservation aims without cooperation among stakeholders including reservoir operators. When freshwater resources become scarce there is a trade-off between human resource demands and environmental sustainability. The cost of conserving freshwater ecosystems can potentially be reduced by implementing institutional reforms that endow environmental water managers with a permanent water entitlement and the capacity to store, trade and release water. Australia's Murray Darling Basin Plan (MDBP) includes one of the world's most ambitious programs to recover water for the environment, supported by institutional reforms that allow environmental water managers to operate in water markets. One of the anticipated benefits of the Plan is to improve the health of flood-dependent forests, which are among the most endangered ecosystems globally because of river regulation and land clearance. However, periodic flooding to conserve floodplain ecosystems in the MDB creates losses to riparian landowners such as damage to fencing and temporary loss of access to flooded land. To reduce these losses reservoir operators restrict daily water release volumes. Using a model of optimal water management in Australia's southern MDB we estimate that current reservoir operating restrictions will substantially reduce the ecological benefits of investments made to recover water for the environment. The reduction in benefits is largest if floodplain forests decline rapidly without periodic inundation. In the latter circumstances, ecological losses cannot significantly be reduced by allowing environmental water managers to operate in water markets. Our findings demonstrate that the recovery of large volumes of water for environmental purposes and water market reforms are insufficient for conserving flood-dependent ecosystems without coordination and cooperation among multiple stakeholders responsible for water and land management.
Availability note (English)
Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.11.232Additional details
Identifiers
- DOI
- 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.11.232;
- PII
- S0048969717332904;
Publishing Information
- Journal Title
- Science of the Total Environment
- Journal Volume
- 621
- Journal Page Range
- p. 407-416
- ISSN
- 0048-9697
- CODEN
- STENDL
INIS
- Country of Publication
- Netherlands
- Country of Input or Organization
- International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
- INIS RN
- 53036382
- Subject category
- S54: ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES;
- Descriptors DEI
- AUSTRALIA; CLIMATIC CHANGE; ECOSYSTEMS; FLOODS; FORESTS; FRESH WATER; INVESTMENT; MATERIALS RECOVERY; RIVERS; SUSTAINABILITY; WATER RESOURCES
- Descriptors DEC
- AUSTRALASIA; DEVELOPED COUNTRIES; HYDROGEN COMPOUNDS; MANAGEMENT; OXYGEN COMPOUNDS; PROCESSING; RESOURCES; SURFACE WATERS; WASTE MANAGEMENT; WASTE PROCESSING; WATER
Optional Information
- Copyright
- Copyright (c) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.