Integration optimisation of elevated pressure air separation unit with gas turbine in an IGCC power plant
- 1. School of Agricultural & Biological Engineering, Purdue University, South University St. 225, West Lafayette, IN 47907-2093 (United States)
- 2. State Key Laboratory of Clean Energy Utilisation, Institute for Thermal Power Engineering, Zhejiang University, Zheda Rd. 38, Hangzhou 310027 (China)
- 3. State Key Laboratory of Control and Simulation of Power System and Generation Equipments, Department of Thermal Engineering, Tsinghua University, Haidian District, Beijing 100084 (China)
- 4. Guangdong Electric Power Design Institute, China Energy Engineering Group Co. Ltd., Tianfeng Rd. 1, Guangzhou 510663 (China)
- 5. Institute for Energy and Power Engineering, College of Mechanical Engineering, Zhejiang University of Technology, Chaowang Rd. 18, Hangzhou 310014 (China)
Description
Highlights: • IGCC thermodynamic model was setup carefully. • Simulations focus on integration between an elevated pressure ASU with gas turbine. • Different recommended solutions from those of low pressure ASUs are figured out. • Full N2 injection and 80% air extraction was suggested as the optimum integration. - Abstract: The integration optimisation between an elevated pressure air separation unit (EP-ASU) and gas turbine is beneficial to promote net efficiency of an integrated gasification combined cycle (IGCC) power plant. This study sets up the thermodynamic model for a 400 MW plant specially coupled with an EP-ASU, aiming to examine system performances under different integrations and acquire the optimum solution. Influences of air extraction rate at conditions of without, partial and full N2 injection, as well as the effects of N2 injection rate when adopting separate ASU, partial and full integrated ASU were both analysed. Special attention has been paid to performance differences between utilising an EP-ASU and a low pressure unit. Results indicated that integration solution with a separate EP-ASU or without N2 injection would not be reasonable. Among various recommended solutions for different integration conditions, N2 injection rate increased with the growth of air extraction rate. The integration with an air extraction rate of 80% and full N2 injection was suggested as the optimum solution. It is concluded that the optimum integration solution when adopting an EP-ASU is different from that using a low pressure one.
Availability note (English)
Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2016.09.059Additional details
Identifiers
- DOI
- 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2016.09.059;
- PII
- S1359-4311(16)31655-6;
Publishing Information
- Journal Title
- Applied Thermal Engineering
- Journal Volume
- 110
- Journal Page Range
- p. 1525-1532
- ISSN
- 1359-4311
- CODEN
- ATENFT
INIS
- Country of Publication
- United Kingdom
- Country of Input or Organization
- International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
- INIS RN
- 48063316
- Subject category
- S37: INORGANIC, ORGANIC, PHYSICAL AND ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY;
- Descriptors DEI
- AIR; COMBINED-CYCLE POWER PLANTS; EXTRACTION; GAS INJECTION; GAS TURBINES; GASIFICATION; NITROGEN; OPTIMIZATION; PRESSURE RANGE KILO PA; SIMULATION; THERMAL EFFICIENCY; THERMODYNAMIC MODEL; THERMODYNAMICS
- Descriptors DEC
- EFFICIENCY; ELEMENTS; EQUIPMENT; FLUID INJECTION; FLUIDS; GASES; MACHINERY; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; NONMETALS; PARTICLE MODELS; POWER PLANTS; PRESSURE RANGE; SEPARATION PROCESSES; STATISTICAL MODELS; THERMAL POWER PLANTS; THERMOCHEMICAL PROCESSES; TURBINES; TURBOMACHINERY
Optional Information
- Copyright
- Copyright (c) 2016 Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam, The Netherlands, All rights reserved.