Published April 2019 | Version v1
Journal article

Process design and economic optimization of boil-off-gas re-liquefaction systems for LNG carriers

  • 1. Department of Energy and Process Engineering, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Kolbjørn Hejes Vei 1B, NO-7491, Trondheim (Norway)
  • 2. Department of Naval Architecture and Ocean Engineering, Seoul National University, 1 Gwanak-ro, Gwanak-gu, Seoul, 08826 (Korea, Republic of)
  • 3. Research Institute of Marine Systems Engineering, Seoul National University, 1 Gwanak-ro, Gwanak-gu, Seoul, 08826 (Korea, Republic of)

Description

Highlights: • Boil-off gas (BOG) reliquefaction processes are introduced for LNG carriers using high pressure fuel. • The process options are developed based on self-liquefaction using the Linde-Hampson process. • Self-reliquefaction of BOG on LNG carriers reduces total annual cost (TAC) by at least 9.4%. • The use of a liquid turbine in the process options results in extra savings in TAC. • The self-reliquefaction systems are economical when the LNG price is higher than 4 USD/MMBtu. -- Abstract: Recent LNG carriers are equipped with high pressure gas injection engines. However, there has been a lack of research on liquefaction processes for boil-off gas (BOG) on LNG ships driven by high pressure fuel. Thus, this paper investigates the economic feasibility of the additional BOG liquefaction facilities in the high pressure fuel supply system on the vessels. To utilize the existing BOG compressor for fuel production, the liquefaction was conducted by the Joule Thomson (JT) cycle, which can use the pressurized BOG as a working fluid. For the comparison of the fuel supply system and its variations with BOG liquefaction, they are optimized with respect to total annual cost (TAC) as the objective function. With an LNG price of 5 USD/MMBtu, the optimization results show that the use of BOG liquefiers on LNG vessels reduces the TAC by at least 9.4% compared to the high pressure fuel supply system. The use of a liquid turbine in the liquefaction configurations also resulted in 2.4% savings in TAC compared to the JT cycle based process. However, a sensitivity analysis with different LNG prices indicates that the liquefaction systems are not economical compared to the fuel supply system when the LNG price is lower than 4 USD/MMBtu.

Additional details

Identifiers

DOI
10.1016/j.energy.2019.02.098;
PII
S0360544219302932;

Publishing Information

Journal Title
Energy (Oxford)
Journal Volume
173
Journal Page Range
p. 1119-1129
ISSN
0360-5442
CODEN
ENEYDS

INIS

Country of Publication
United Kingdom
Country of Input or Organization
International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
INIS RN
55012174
Subject category
S42: ENGINEERING; S03: NATURAL GAS;
Descriptors DEI
COMPRESSORS; DESIGN; LIQUEFACTION; LIQUEFIED NATURAL GAS; OPTIMIZATION; PRICES; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; VAPOR CONDENSERS; WORKING FLUIDS
Descriptors DEC
ENERGY SOURCES; FLUIDS; FOSSIL FUELS; FUEL GAS; FUELS; GAS FUELS; GASES; LIQUEFIED GASES; LIQUIDS; NATURAL GAS; THERMOCHEMICAL PROCESSES

Optional Information

Copyright
Copyright (c) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.