Published August 2018 | Version v1
Journal article

Hierarchical cluster analysis of technical replicates to identify interferents in untargeted mass spectrometry metabolomics

  • 1. Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Patricia A. Sullivan Science Building, 301 McIver St, 445 Sullivan Science Building, University of North Carolina at Greensboro, Greensboro, NC (United States)
  • 2. Department of Chemistry, University of Bergen, Bergen (Norway)

Description

Highlights: • We develop a method to remove interferents in mass spectrometry metabolomics. • Interferents are identified when abundance varies among technical replicates. • We show that blank subtraction does not remove this type of interference. • Hierarchical clustering analysis confirms that filtering has been sufficient. • This approach could be used for data pretreatment in other analytical studies. - Abstract: Mass spectral data sets often contain experimental artefacts, and data filtering prior to statistical analysis is crucial to extract reliable information. This is particularly true in untargeted metabolomics analyses, where the analyte(s) of interest are not known a priori. It is often assumed that chemical interferents (i.e. solvent contaminants such as plasticizers) are consistent across samples, and can be removed by background subtraction from blank injections. On the contrary, it is shown here that chemical contaminants may vary in abundance across each injection, potentially leading to their misidentification as relevant sample components. With this metabolomics study, we demonstrate the effectiveness of hierarchical cluster analysis (HCA) of replicate injections (technical replicates) as a methodology to identify chemical interferents and reduce their contaminating contribution to metabolomics models. Pools of metabolites with varying complexity were prepared from the botanical Angelica keiskei Koidzumi and spiked with known metabolites. Each set of pools was analyzed in triplicate and at multiple concentrations using ultraperformance liquid chromatography coupled to mass spectrometry (UPLC-MS). Before filtering, HCA failed to cluster replicates in the data sets. To identify contaminant peaks, we developed a filtering process that evaluated the relative peak area variance of each variable within triplicate injections. These interferent peaks were found across all samples, but did not show consistent peak area from injection to injection, even when evaluating the same chemical sample. This filtering process identified 128 ions that appear to originate from the UPLC-MS system. Data sets collected for a high number of pools with comparatively simple chemical composition were highly influenced by these chemical interferents, as were samples that were analyzed at a low concentration. When chemical interferent masses were removed, technical replicates clustered in all data sets. This work highlights the importance of technical replication in mass spectrometry-based studies, and presents a new application of HCA as a tool for evaluating the effectiveness of data filtering prior to statistical analysis.

Availability note (English)

Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aca.2018.03.013

Additional details

Identifiers

DOI
10.1016/j.aca.2018.03.013;
PII
S0003267018303787;

Publishing Information

Journal Title
Analytica Chimica Acta
Journal Volume
1021
Journal Page Range
p. 69-77
ISSN
0003-2670
CODEN
ACACAM

INIS

Country of Publication
Netherlands
Country of Input or Organization
International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
INIS RN
50006918
Subject category
S37: INORGANIC, ORGANIC, PHYSICAL AND ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY;
Descriptors DEI
CHEMICAL COMPOSITION; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; FILTERS; INJECTION; INTERFERENCE; IONS; LIQUID COLUMN CHROMATOGRAPHY; MASS SPECTROSCOPY; PEAKS; PONDS
Descriptors DEC
CHARGED PARTICLES; CHROMATOGRAPHY; DATA ANALYSIS; DATA PROCESSING; INTAKE; PROCESSING; SEPARATION PROCESSES; SPECTROSCOPY; SURFACE WATERS

Optional Information

Copyright
Copyright (c) 2017 Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam, The Netherlands, All rights reserved.