Published June 2011 | Version v1
Journal article

Life-cycle greenhouse gas emissions and energy balances of sugarcane ethanol production in Mexico

  • 1. Posgrado en Ingenieria (Energia), Centro de Investigacion en Energia, Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico, Privada Xochicalco S/N, Colonia Centro, Temixco, Morelos 62580 (Mexico)
  • 2. Posgrado en Ingenieria (Energia), Facultad de Ingenieria, Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexic, Av. Universidad No. 3000. 04510, Mexico D.F. (Mexico)
  • 3. Centro de Investigaciones en Ecosistemas, Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico, Antigua Carretera a Patzcuaro No. 8701 Colonia Ex-Hacienda de San Jose de la Huerta, 58190 Morelia, Michoacan (Mexico)
  • 4. Center for Development Research (ZEF), University of Bonn, Walter-Flex-Str. 3, 53113 Bonn (Germany)
  • 5. IFEU Institute for Energy and Environmental Research Heidelberg GmbH, Wilckensstr. 3, 69120 Heidelberg (Germany)
  • 6. Red Mexicana de Bioenergia A.C. Av. San Jose del Cerrito, 400-51 Col. El Pueblito CP 58341 Morelia, Mich. (Mexico)
  • 7. Centro de Investigacion en Energia, Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico, Privada Xochicalco S/N, Colonia Centro, Temixco, Morelos 62580 (Mexico)

Description

The purpose of this work was to estimate GHG emissions and energy balances for the future expansion of sugarcane ethanol fuel production in Mexico with one current and four possible future modalities. We used the life cycle methodology that is recommended by the European Renewable Energy Directive (RED), which distinguished the following five system phases: direct Land Use Change (LUC); crop production; biomass transport to industry; industrial processing; and ethanol transport to admixture plants. Key variables affecting total GHG emissions and fossil energy used in ethanol production were LUC emissions, crop fertilization rates, the proportion of sugarcane areas that are burned to facilitate harvest, fossil fuels used in the industrial phase, and the method for allocation of emissions to co-products. The lower emissions and higher energy ratios that were observed in the present Brazilian case were mainly due to the lesser amount of fertilizers applied, also were due to the shorter distance of sugarcane transport, and to the smaller proportion of sugarcane areas that were burned to facilitate manual harvest. The resulting modality with the lowest emissions of equivalent carbon dioxide (CO2e) was ethanol produced from direct juice and generating surplus electricity with 36.8 kgCO2e/GJethanol. This was achieved using bagasse as the only fuel source to satisfy industrial phase needs for electricity and steam. Mexican emissions were higher than those calculated for Brazil (27.5 kgCO2e/GJethanol) among all modalities. The Mexican modality with the highest ratio of renewable/fossil energy was also ethanol from sugarcane juice generating surplus electricity with 4.8 GJethanol/GJfossil.

Availability note (English)

Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2010.12.072

Additional details

Identifiers

DOI
10.1016/j.apenergy.2010.12.072;
PII
S0306-2619(10)00592-1;

Publishing Information

Journal Title
Applied Energy
Journal Volume
88
Journal Issue
6
Journal Page Range
p. 2088-2097
ISSN
0306-2619
CODEN
APENDX

Optional Information

Copyright
Copyright (c) 2010 Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam, The Netherlands, All rights reserved.