Published January 2010 | Version v1
Journal article

Economic assessment and comparison of acacia energy crop with annual traditional crops in Southern Europe

  • 1. SosteniPrA (UAB-IRTA), Institut de Ciencia i Tecnologia Ambientals (ICTA), Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona - UAB, 08193 Bellaterra, Barcelona (Spain) and Inedit Innovacio s.l. (Inedit). IRTA Km2 Carretera de Cabrils (Barcelona) (Spain)
  • 2. Dipartimento di Economia e Ingegneria Agraria Forestale e Ambientale, University of Torino (Italy)
  • 3. Chemical Engineering Department, Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona (UAB), 08193 Bellaterra, Barcelona (Spain)
  • 4. SosteniPrA (UAB-IRTA), Institut de Ciencia i Tecnologia Ambientals (ICTA), Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona -UAB, 08193 Bellaterra, Barcelona (Spain)

Description

In several policy documents bioenergy is recognized as an important renewable energy source in Italy. The increase in energy prices represents an opportunity for lignocellulosic energy crops such as acacia and poplar. However, for Short Rotation Coppice (SRC) and Short Rotation Forestry (SRF) to be adopted by farmers, these crops must be perceived to be at least as profitable as crops that normally compete with these plantations for land use. The purpose of this paper is to evaluate the economic feasibility of acacia (Robinia pseudoacacia) as an energy crop in a low input production regime in Italy and, in particular, to consider its competitiveness with wheat. Our results show that neither SRC and SRF techniques using assumed production costs ( Euro 3820 and Euro 5285 ha-1 yr-1) nor biomass productions are able to obtain a positive profit (- Euro 184 and - Euro 172 ha-1 yr-1) that can convince farmers to invest in biomass plantations on their land. The results demonstrate that wheat is a more economically secure option than SRC or SRF. The viability of local biomass production in Italy and Southern Europe depends on the active support of the governments; without them, biomass is not economically competitive for the farmers when compared to crops such as wheat.

Availability note (English)

Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2009.10.011

Additional details

Identifiers

DOI
10.1016/j.enpol.2009.10.011;
PII
S0301-4215(09)00738-1;

Publishing Information

Journal Title
Energy Policy
Journal Volume
38
Journal Issue
1
Journal Page Range
p. 592-597
ISSN
0301-4215
CODEN
ENPYAC

INIS

Country of Publication
United Kingdom
Country of Input or Organization
International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
INIS RN
41098251
Subject category
S09: BIOMASS FUELS;
Descriptors DEI
BIOMASS; BIOMASS PLANTATIONS; COMPARATIVE EVALUATIONS; COPPICES; COST; CROPS; ECONOMICS; FORESTRY; ITALY; LAND USE; LOCUST TREES; POPLARS; PRICES; VIABILITY; WHEAT
Descriptors DEC
CEREALS; DEVELOPED COUNTRIES; ENERGY SOURCES; EUROPE; EVALUATION; FORESTS; GRAMINEAE; LEGUMINOSAE; LILIOPSIDA; MAGNOLIOPHYTA; MAGNOLIOPSIDA; PLANTS; RENEWABLE ENERGY SOURCES; TREES; WESTERN EUROPE

Optional Information

Copyright
Copyright (c) 2009 Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam, The Netherlands, All rights reserved.