Fully predictive time-dependent transport simulations of ITB plasmas in JET, JT-60U and DIII-D
Creators
- 1. Association Euratom-Tekes, VTT, PO Box 1000, FIN-02044 VTT (Finland)
- 2. Association Euratom-CEA, CEA-DSM-DRFC Cadarache, 13108, St Paul lez Durance (France)
- 3. Euratom/UKAEA Fusion Association, Culham Science Centre, Abingdon, Oxon OX14 3DB (United Kingdom)
- 4. Association Euratom-VR, Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg (Sweden)
Description
For the first time, the predictive capabilities of the mixed Bohm/GyroBohm, Weiland and 'retuned' GLF23 transport models are investigated with ITB discharges from the ITPA ITB database with fully predictive, time-dependent transport simulations. A range of plasma conditions is examined for JET, JT-60U and DIII-D discharges with internal transport barriers (ITBs). The simulations show that the Bohm/GyroBohm model is able to follow the time evolution of the discharge from the preheating phase without an ITB through the ITB onset phase until the high performance phase with fair accuracy in most cases in JET and JT-60U. This indicates the importance of the interplay between the magnetic shear and ωExB flow shear in ITB formation since these are the mechanisms that govern the ITB physics in the model. In order to achieve good agreement in DIII-D, the α-stabilization had to be included in the model, emphasizing the role played by the α-stabilization in the physics of the ITBs. The Weiland and GLF23 transport models show limited agreement between the model predictions and experimental time evolution of the ITB and kinetic plasma profiles. The Weiland model does not form a clear ITB in any of the three tokamaks despite varying plasma profiles, such as the q-profile. On the other hand, the average temperatures and density are often in fair agreement with experimental values. The GLF23 model often predicts an ITB, but its radial location is often too far inside the plasma, or shrinks as the simulations proceed in time. Consequently, the central temperatures at the end of the simulations during the high performance phase are usually underestimated. It is worth noting that GLF23 features in general better predictions of the Te and Ti profiles outside the ITB than the other models studied. Achieving the quantitative capability to predict the multi-channel ITB dynamics with fully predictive, time-dependent transport simulations has turned out to be extremely challenging
Availability note (English)
Available online at http://stacks.iop.org/0029-5515/46/548/nf6_5_007.pdf or at the Web site for the journal Nuclear Fusion (ISSN 1741-4326 ) http://www.iop.org/Additional details
Identifiers
- URL
- http://stacks.iop.org/0029-5515/46/548/nf6_5_007.pdf;
- DOI
- 10.1088/0029-5515/46/5/007;
- PII
- S0029-5515(06)16341-3;
Publishing Information
- Journal Title
- Nuclear Fusion
- Journal Volume
- 46
- Journal Issue
- 5
- Journal Page Range
- p. 548-561
- ISSN
- 0029-5515
- CODEN
- NUFUAU
INIS
- Country of Publication
- International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
- Country of Input or Organization
- International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
- INIS RN
- 37052636
- Subject category
- S70: PLASMA PHYSICS AND FUSION TECHNOLOGY;
- Descriptors DEI
- CHARGED-PARTICLE TRANSPORT; COMPUTERIZED SIMULATION; DOUBLET-3 DEVICE; JET TOKAMAK; JT-60U TOKAMAK; PERFORMANCE; PLASMA; PLASMA DENSITY; PLASMA RADIAL PROFILES; PLASMA SIMULATION; SHEAR; STABILIZATION; THERMAL BARRIERS; TIME DEPENDENCE; TRANSPORT THEORY
- Descriptors DEC
- CLOSED PLASMA DEVICES; RADIATION TRANSPORT; SIMULATION; THERMONUCLEAR DEVICES; TOKAMAK DEVICES
Optional Information
- Collaborations
- JET-EFDA Contributors