Published September 15, 2011 | Version v1
Journal article

Sustainable and safe design of footwear integrating ecological footprint and risk criteria

  • 1. Sustainable Processes and Products Engineering Group, Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Santiago de Compostela, Campus Vida, 15705 Santiago de Compostela (Spain)
  • 2. Industrias de Diseno Textil, S.A., Edificio Inditex, Av. de la Diputacion s/n, Poligono de Sabon, 15142 Arteixo - A Coruna (Spain)

Description

Highlights: → The ecological footprint (EF) is a suitable screening indicator to assist the assessment of the sustainability of an ecodesign proposal. → The EF does not consider the risk derived from hazardous substances in its evaluation. → Environmental risk assessment (ERA) successfully complemented the evaluation of the EF providing safety criteria. → Options that exceeded the safety limits for Hazard Quotient and Cancer Risk where discarded, thus guaranteeing the protection of children. → Trade-offs among criteria could be established by the application of fuzzy logic techniques to derive an ecodesign index. - Abstract: The ecodesign of a product implies that different potential environmental impacts of diverse nature must be taken into account considering its whole life cycle, apart from the general design criteria (i.e. technical, functional, ergonomic, aesthetic or economic). In this sense, a sustainability assessment methodology, ecological footprint (EF), and environmental risk assessment (ERA), were combined for the first time to derive complementary criteria for the ecodesign of footwear. Four models of children's shoes were analyzed and compared. The synthetic shoes obtained a smaller EF (6.5 gm2) when compared to the leather shoes (11.1 gm2). However, high concentrations of hazardous substances were detected in the former, even making the Hazard Quotient (HQ) and the Cancer Risk (CR) exceed the recommended safety limits for one of the synthetic models analyzed. Risk criteria were prioritized in this case and, consequently, the design proposal was discarded. For the other cases, the perspective provided by the indicators of different nature was balanced to accomplish a fairest evaluation. The selection of fibers produced under sustainable criteria and the reduction of the materials consumption was recommended, since the area requirements would be minimized and the absence of hazardous compounds would ensure safety conditions during the use stage.

Availability note (English)

Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2011.07.028

Additional details

Identifiers

DOI
10.1016/j.jhazmat.2011.07.028;
PII
S0304-3894(11)00909-5;

Publishing Information

Journal Title
Journal of Hazardous Materials
Journal Volume
192
Journal Issue
3
Journal Page Range
p. 1876-1881
ISSN
0304-3894
CODEN
JHMAD9

INIS

Country of Publication
Netherlands
Country of Input or Organization
International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
INIS RN
44107836
Subject category
S42: ENGINEERING; S98: NUCLEAR DISARMAMENT, SAFEGUARDS AND PHYSICAL PROTECTION;
Descriptors DEI
CHILDREN; DESIGN; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS; HAZARDS; LIFE CYCLE; NEOPLASMS; RISK ASSESSMENT; SAFETY
Descriptors DEC
AGE GROUPS; ANIMALS; DISEASES; MAMMALS; MAN; PRIMATES; VERTEBRATES

Optional Information

Copyright
Copyright (c) 2011 Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam, The Netherlands, All rights reserved.