There is a newer version of the record available.

Published 2024 | Version v1
Journal article

CT in musculoskeletal imaging: still helpful and for what?

  • 1. Department of Radiology and Imaging, Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 East 70th Street, 10021, New York, NY (United States)
  • 2. Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY (United States)
  • 3. The Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 21287, Baltimore, MD (United States)
  • 4. Department of Medical Imaging and Intervention, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taoyuan, Taiwan (China)
  • 5. Musculoskeletal Radiology, The Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 601 N. Caroline Street, JHOC 5165, 21287, Baltimore, MD (United States)
  • 6. Faculty of Biomedical Sciences, Università Della Svizzera Italiana (USI), Via G. Buffi 13, 6904, Lugano (Switzerland)
  • 7. Clinic of Radiology, Imaging Institute of Southern Switzerland (IIMSI), Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale (EOC), Via Tesserete 46, 6900, Lugano (Switzerland)
  • 8. Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen (Denmark)
  • 9. Department of Radiology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg, Nielsine Nielsens Vej 5, Entrance 7A, 3Rd Floor, 2400, Copenhagen, NV (Denmark)
  • 10. Department of Imaging Physics, Institute for Data Science in Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX (United States)

Description

Computed tomography (CT) is a common modality employed for musculoskeletal imaging. Conventional CT techniques are useful for the assessment of trauma in detection, characterization and surgical planning of complex fractures. CT arthrography can depict internal derangement lesions and impact medical decision making of orthopedic providers. In oncology, CT can have a role in the characterization of bone tumors and may elucidate soft tissue mineralization patterns. Several advances in CT technology have led to a variety of acquisition techniques with distinct clinical applications. These include four-dimensional CT, which allows examination of joints during motion; cone-beam CT, which allows examination during physiological weight-bearing conditions; dual-energy CT, which allows material decomposition useful in musculoskeletal deposition disorders (e.g., gout) and bone marrow edema detection; and photon-counting CT, which provides increased spatial resolution, decreased radiation, and material decomposition compared to standard multi-detector CT systems due to its ability to directly translate X-ray photon energies into electrical signals. Advanced acquisition techniques provide higher spatial resolution scans capable of enhanced bony microarchitecture and bone mineral density assessment. Together, these CT acquisition techniques will continue to play a substantial role in the practices of orthopedics, rheumatology, metabolic bone, oncology, and interventional radiology.

Additional details

Identifiers

Publishing Information

Journal Title
Skeletal Radiology
Journal Volume
53
Journal Issue
9
Journal Page Range
p. 1711-1725
ISSN
0364-2348
CODEN
SKRADI