Published November 1, 2017 | Version v1
Journal article

Prospective Clinical Implementation of a Novel Magnetic Resonance Tracking Device for Real-Time Brachytherapy Catheter Positioning

  • 1. Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts (United States)
  • 2. Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland (United States)
  • 3. Department of Radiation Oncology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts (United States)
  • 4. MRI Interventions Inc, Irvine, California (United States)
  • 5. Department of Radiology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio (United States)
  • 6. Siemens Healthineers, Boston, Massachusetts (United States)
  • 7. Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Baltimore, Maryland (United States)

Description

Purpose: We designed and built dedicated active magnetic resonance (MR)-tracked (MRTR) stylets. We explored the role of MRTR in a prospective clinical trial. Methods and Materials: Eleven gynecologic cancer patients underwent MRTR to rapidly optimize interstitial catheter placement. MRTR catheter tip location and orientation were computed and overlaid on images displayed on in-room monitors at rates of 6 to 16 frames per second. Three modes of actively tracked navigation were analyzed: coarse navigation to the approximate region around the tumor; fine-tuning, bringing the stylets to the desired location; and pullback, with MRTR stylets rapidly withdrawn from within the catheters, providing catheter trajectories for radiation treatment planning (RTP). Catheters with conventional stylets were inserted, forming baseline locations. MRTR stylets were substituted, and catheter navigation was performed by a clinician working inside the MRI bore, using monitor feedback. Results: Coarse navigation allowed repositioning of the MRTR catheters tips by 16 mm (mean), relative to baseline, in 14 ± 5 s/catheter (mean ± standard deviation [SD]). The fine-tuning mode repositioned the catheter tips by a further 12 mm, in 24 ± 17 s/catheter. Pullback mode provided catheter trajectories with RTP point resolution of ∼1.5 mm, in 1 to 9 s/catheter. Conclusions: MRTR-based navigation resulted in rapid and optimal placement of interstitial brachytherapy catheters. Catheters were repositioned compared with the initial insertion without tracking. In pullback mode, catheter trajectories matched computed tomographic precision, enabling their use for RTP.

Availability note (English)

Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2017.05.054

Additional details

Identifiers

DOI
10.1016/j.ijrobp.2017.05.054;
PII
S0360-3016(17)31005-2;

Publishing Information

Journal Title
International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology and Physics
Journal Volume
99
Journal Issue
3
Journal Page Range
p. 618-626
ISSN
0360-3016
CODEN
IOBPD3

INIS

Country of Publication
United States
Country of Input or Organization
International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
INIS RN
49073836
Subject category
S62: RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE;
Descriptors DEI
BRACHYTHERAPY; CLINICAL TRIALS; NEOPLASMS; NMR IMAGING
Descriptors DEC
DIAGNOSTIC TECHNIQUES; DISEASES; MEDICINE; NUCLEAR MEDICINE; RADIOLOGY; RADIOTHERAPY; TESTING; THERAPY

Optional Information

Copyright
Copyright (c) 2017 Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam, The Netherlands, All rights reserved.