Published July 2021 | Version v1
Journal article

Estimating catchment scale soil moisture at a high spatial resolution: Integrating remote sensing and machine learning

  • 1. School of Engineering, College of Engineering, Science and Environment, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW 2308 (Australia)
  • 2. Department of Civil Engineering, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria 3800 (Australia)

Description

Highlights: • High spatial resolution soil moisture is important for a number of applications. • A regression tree, an ANN and a GPR model were developed to downscale soil moisture. • Downscaling models were developed based on the soil thermal inertia theory. • Coarse spatial resolution soil moisture was downscaled to 1 km. • The results, especially from regression tree and GPR models, are very encouraging. Soil moisture information is important for a wide range of applications including hydrologic modelling, climatic modelling and agriculture. L-band passive microwave satellite remote sensing is the most feasible option to estimate near-surface soil moisture (~0–5 cm soil depth) over large extents, but its coarse resolution (~10s of km) means that it is unable to capture the variability of soil moisture in detail. Therefore, different downscaling methods have been tested as a solution to meet the demand for high spatial resolution soil moisture. Downscaling algorithms based on the soil thermal inertia relationship between diurnal soil temperature difference (ΔT) and daily mean soil moisture content (μSM) have shown promising results over arid and semi-arid landscapes. However, the linearity of these algorithms is affected by factors such as vegetation, soil texture and meteorology in a complex manner. This study tested a (i) Regression Tree (RT), an Artificial Neural Network (ANN), and a Gaussian Process Regression (GPR) model based on the soil thermal inertia theory over a semi-arid agricultural landscape in Australia, given the ability of machine learning algorithms to capture complex, non-linear relationships between predictors and responses. Downscaled soil moisture from the RT, ANN and GPR models showed root mean square errors (RMSEs) of 0.03, 0.09 and 0.07 cm3/cm3 compared to airborne retrievals and unbiased RMSEs (ubRMSEs) of 0.07, 0.08 and 0.05 cm3/cm3 compared to in-situ observations, respectively. The study showed encouraging results to integrate machine learning techniques in estimating near-surface soil moisture at a high spatial resolution.

Availability note (English)

Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.145924

Additional details

Identifiers

DOI
10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.145924;
PII
S0048969721009918;

Publishing Information

Journal Title
Science of the Total Environment
Journal Volume
776
Journal Page Range
vp.
ISSN
0048-9697
CODEN
STENDL

Optional Information

Copyright
Copyright (c) 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.