Published May 2021 | Version v1
Journal article

Prospective study of lipiodol distribution as an imaging marker for doxorubicin pharmacokinetics during conventional transarterial chemoembolization of liver malignancies

  • 1. Institute of Radiology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin (Germany)
  • 2. Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, Division of Interventional Radiology, Yale School of Medicine, 333 Cedar Street, 06520, New Haven, CT (United States)
  • 3. Department of Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne (Germany)
  • 4. PreScience Labs/Cage Pharma, Westport, CT (United States)
  • 5. Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Department of Oncology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD (United States)

Description

To evaluate the prognostic potential of Lipiodol distribution for the pharmacokinetic (PK) profiles of doxorubicin (DOX) and doxorubicinol (DOXOL) after conventional transarterial chemoembolization (cTACE). This prospective clinical trial (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02753881) included 30 consecutive participants with liver malignancies treated with cTACE (5/2016-10/2018) using 50 mg DOX/10 mg mitomycin C emulsified 1:2 with ethiodized oil (Lipiodol). Peripheral blood was sampled at 10 timepoints for standard non-compartmental analysis of peak concentrations (Cmax) and area under the curve (AUC) with dose normalization (DN). Imaging markers included Lipiodol distribution on post-cTACE CT for patient stratification into 1 segment (n = 10), ≥ 2 segments (n = 10), and lobar cTACE (n = 10), and baseline enhancing tumor volume (ETV). Adverse events (AEs) and tumor response on MRI were recorded 3-4 weeks post-cTACE. Statistics included repeated measurement ANOVA (RM-ANOVA), Mann-Whitney, Kruskal-Wallis, Fisher's exact test, and Pearson correlation. Hepatocellular (n = 26), cholangiocarcinoma (n = 1), and neuroendocrine metastases (n = 3) were included. Stratified according to Lipiodol distribution, DOX-Cmax increased from 1 segment (DOX-Cmax, 83.94 ± 75.09 ng/mL; DN-DOX-Cmax, 2.67 ± 2.02 ng/mL/mg) to ≥ 2 segments (DOX-Cmax, 139.66 ± 117.73 ng/mL; DN-DOX-Cmax, 3.68 ± 4.20 ng/mL/mg) to lobar distribution (DOX-Cmax, 334.35 ± 215.18 ng/mL; DN-DOX-Cmax, 7.11 ± 4.24 ng/mL/mg; p = 0.036). While differences in DN-DOX-AUC remained insignificant, RM-ANOVA revealed significant separation of time concentration curves for DOX (p = 0.023) and DOXOL (p = 0.041) comparing 1, ≥ 2 segments, and lobar cTACE. Additional indicators of higher DN-DOX-Cmax were high ETV (p = 0.047) and Child-Pugh B (p = 0.009). High ETV and tumoral Lipiodol coverage also correlated with tumor response. AE occurred less frequently after segmental cTACE. This prospective clinical trial provides updated PK data revealing Lipiodol distribution as an imaging marker predictive of DOX-Cmax and tumor response after cTACE in liver cancer.

Additional details

Identifiers

Publishing Information

Journal Title
European Radiology
Journal Volume
31
Journal Issue
5
Journal Page Range
p. 3002-3014
ISSN
0938-7994
CODEN
EURAE3