Published February 2021 | Version v1
Journal article

Canopy mitigates the effects of nitrogen deposition on soil carbon-related processes in a subtropical forest

  • 1. Heshan National Field Research Station of Forest Ecosystem, South China Botanical Garden, Guangzhou 510650 (China)
  • 2. Key Laboratory of Vegetation Restoration and Management of Degraded Ecosystems, South China Botanical Garden, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Xingke Road 723, Guangzhou 510650 (China)
  • 3. Department of Ecology, School of Life Sciences, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210023 (China)
  • 4. Southern Marine Science and Engineering Guangdong Laboratory, Guangzhou 511458 (China)
  • 5. Center for Ecosystem Science and Society, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ 86011 (United States)
  • 6. College of Environment and Planning, Henan University, Kaifeng 475004 (China)

Description

Highlights: • Forest soil carbon responds to canopy and understory nitrogen addition is different. • Canopy nitrogen addition does not enhance soil organic carbon content. • Understory nitrogen addition significantly increased soil organic carbon content. The rapid increases in atmospheric nitrogen (N) deposition have greatly affected the carbon (C) cycles of terrestrial ecosystems. Most studies concerning on the effects of N deposition have simulated N deposition by directly applying N to the understory and have therefore not accounted for the possibility of N absorption, retention, and transformation by the canopy. In this study, we compared the effects of understory addition of N (UN), canopy addition of N (CN) at 25 and 50 kg N ha−1 yr−1, and ambient addition of N (CK) on soil carbon-related processes in a subtropical forest. After seven years of addition, the contribution of new C from litter (Fnew) was more than 2× greater with UN treatments than with CN treatments. UN treatments significantly increased the activity of β-1,4-glucosidase (BG) but reduced the activities of β-1,4-N-acetylglucosaminidase (NAG), polyphenol oxidase (PPO), and peroxidase (PER). CN treatments, in contrast, did not alter the activities of extracellular enzyme. Compared to CN, UN treatments significantly enhanced soil organic carbon (SOC) and mean weight diameter (MWD, represents soil aggregate stability). Differences in the responses of SOC and MWD to CN and UN treatments were positively correlated with Fnew but negatively correlated with the activities of PPO and PER. The results imply that forest canopy mitigates the effects of atmospheric N inputs on SOC, and that conventional understory N addition might overestimate the positive effects of N deposition on forest soil C-related processes. We suggest that CN rather than UN should be used to simulate the effects of atmospheric N deposition on soil C dynamics in subtropical forests.

Availability note (English)

Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.143847

Additional details

Identifiers

DOI
10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.143847;
PII
S0048969720373782;

Publishing Information

Journal Title
Science of the Total Environment
Journal Volume
757
Journal Page Range
vp.
ISSN
0048-9697
CODEN
STENDL

Optional Information

Copyright
Copyright (c) 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.