Published August 1990
| Version v1
Journal article
Can the myth be maintained? - understanding the economics of Sizewell B
Description
The cost of electricity generated by Sizewell-B is discussed as this has been the model for the economic arguments in favour of the proposed Hinkley Point C pressurised water station. However, since the Energy Select Committee report concluding that electricity from Sizewell-B will be substantially dearer than from coal-fired stations was published public justification is now expressed in terms of benefits to the environment. Reduction of the greenhouse effect, security of supply and maintenance of the nuclear option are now more important. The economic case is examined. (UK)
Additional details
Publishing Information
- Journal Title
- SCRAM Journal
- Journal Issue
- no.78
- Series
- SCRAM J.
- CODEN
- SANJE
INIS
- Country of Publication
- United Kingdom
- Country of Input or Organization
- United Kingdom
- INIS RN
- 21090732
- Subject category
- S29: ENERGY PLANNING, POLICY AND ECONOMY; S21: SPECIFIC NUCLEAR REACTORS AND ASSOCIATED PLANTS;
- Descriptors DEI
- CAPITALIZED COST; COST ESTIMATION; ECONOMIC ANALYSIS; ELECTRIC POWER; GREENHOUSE EFFECT; POWER GENERATION; SIZEWELL-B REACTOR
- Descriptors DEC
- COST; ENRICHED URANIUM REACTORS; POWER; POWER REACTORS; PWR TYPE REACTORS; REACTORS; THERMAL REACTORS; WATER COOLED REACTORS; WATER MODERATED REACTORS