Published September 2021 | Version v1
Journal article

The effect of group decisions in heat transitions: An agent-based approach

  • 1. Faculty of Technology, Policy and Management, Delft University of Technology, Jaffalaan 5, 2628, BX, Delft (Netherlands)
  • 2. Bernoulli Institute for Mathematics, Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence, FSE, University of Groningen, Nijenborgh 9, 9747, AG, Groningen (Netherlands)

Description

Highlights: • Modelling of competing combinations of insulation and heating systems without natural gas. • Households as agents with (bounded) financial rationality via implicit or market discount rates. • Exploration of energy taxes, price regulation for heat networks, and phase out of natural gas. • Concept of group lock out to describe households that were constrained by group decisions. • Disconnection policy, decisions within buildings and discount rates were specially influential. The Netherlands aims at reducing natural gas consumption for heating in the housing sector. Although homeowners are responsible for replacing their heating systems and improving dwelling insulation, they are not always able to make individual decisions. Some projects require group decisions within and between buildings. We use an agent-based modelling and simulation approach to explore how these individual and group decisions would influence natural gas consumption and heating costs in an illustrative neighbourhood, under a set of assumptions. We model individual household preferences over combinations of insulation and heating systems as a lifetime cost calculation with implicit discount rates, and we use quorum constraints to represent group decisions. We model three fiscal policies and a policy to disconnect all dwellings from the natural gas network. Results show that the disconnection policy was the only necessary and sufficient condition to incentivize households to replace their heating systems and that group decisions influenced the alternatives that were chosen. Since results were influenced by group decisions within buildings and by the market discount rate, we recommend further research regarding policies around these topics. Future work can apply our approach to case studies, incorporate new empirical knowledge, and explore group decisions in other contexts.

Availability note (English)

Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2021.112306

Additional details

Identifiers

DOI
10.1016/j.enpol.2021.112306;
PII
S0301421521001750;

Publishing Information

Journal Title
Energy Policy
Journal Volume
156
Journal Page Range
vp.
ISSN
0301-4215
CODEN
ENPYAC

INIS

Country of Publication
United Kingdom
Country of Input or Organization
International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
INIS RN
54024166
Subject category
S29: ENERGY PLANNING, POLICY AND ECONOMY;
Descriptors DEI
COMPUTERIZED SIMULATION; ENERGY POLICY; ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY; HEAT; HEATING; HEATING SYSTEMS; HOUSEHOLDS; INTEREST RATE; PRICES; REGULATIONS
Descriptors DEC
ENERGY; ENERGY SYSTEMS; GOVERNMENT POLICIES; LAWS; SIMULATION

Optional Information

Copyright
Copyright (c) 2021 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.