Published March 2017 | Version v1
Journal article

Assessment of diagnostic and prognostic condition indices for efficient and robust maintenance decision-making of systems subject to stress corrosion cracking

  • 1. ICD,ROSAS,LM2S, Université de Technologie de Troyes, UMR 6281, CNRS, Troyes (France)
  • 2. CNRS, GIPSA-lab, F-38000 Grenoble (France)
  • 3. Univ Grenoble Alpes, GIPSA-lab, F-38000 Grenoble (France)

Description

Seeking condition indices characterizing the health state of a system is a key problem in condition-based maintenance. For this purpose, diagnostic and prognostic models have been unceasingly developed and improved over the past few decades; nevertheless none of them explains thoroughly the impacts of such indices on the effectiveness of maintenance operations. As a complement to these efforts, this paper analyzes the effectiveness of some well-known diagnostic and prognostic indices for maintenance decision-making. The study is based on a system subject to competing risks due to multiple crack paths. A periodic inspection scheme is used to monitor the system health state. Each inspection returns the perfect diagnostic information: the number of cracks, corresponding crack sizes, and the system failure/working state. Based on this information, two kinds of prognostic condition indices are predicted: the average value and probability law of the system residual useful life. The associated condition-based maintenance strategies and cost models are then developed and compared with the ones whose maintenance decisions are based on diagnostic condition indices. The comparison results allow us to conclude on the performance and on the robustness of these strategies, hence giving some suggestions on the choice of reliable condition indices for maintenance decision-making. - Highlights: • Developing a new and generic degradation and failure model. • Synthesizing diagnostic and prognostic condition indices on the basis of the developed degradation and failure model. • Building diagnosis and prognosis-based maintenance strategies, and developing the associated cost models. • Assessing the performance and robustness of the considered strategies to find out reliable indices.

Availability note (English)

Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2016.11.022

Additional details

Identifiers

DOI
10.1016/j.ress.2016.11.022;
PII
S0951-8320(16)30877-8;

Publishing Information

Journal Title
Reliability Engineering and System Safety
Journal Volume
159
Journal Page Range
p. 237-254
ISSN
0951-8320
CODEN
RESSEP

INIS

Country of Publication
United Kingdom
Country of Input or Organization
International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
INIS RN
48064686
Subject category
S42: ENGINEERING;
Descriptors DEI
COST; CRACKS; DECISION MAKING; FAILURES; HAZARDS; INSPECTION; MAINTENANCE; MONITORING; PERFORMANCE; PROBABILITY DENSITY FUNCTIONS; SERVICE LIFE; STRESS CORROSION
Descriptors DEC
CHEMICAL REACTIONS; CORROSION; FUNCTIONS; LIFETIME

Optional Information

Copyright
Copyright (c) 2016 Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam, The Netherlands, All rights reserved.