Published September 2021 | Version v1
Journal article

Sources of uncertainty in interdependent infrastructure and their implications

  • 1. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, 20742 (United States)
  • 2. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37235 (United States)
  • 3. Department of Safety, Economics and Planning, University of Stavanger, 4036 Stavanger (Norway)
  • 4. Earth System Science Interdisciplinary Center, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, 20742 (United States)

Description

Highlights: • A hierarchy of uncertainty for interdependent infrastructure is developed. System uncertainty is inherent uncertainty within all coupled infrastructure. Modeling uncertainty occurs when systems are given mathematical representations. • A review of how uncertainty is treated in the literature is provided. While significant modeling advances have unpacked the complexities of interdependent infrastructure, post-disaster reconnaissance consistently demonstrates a wide variability of outcomes and how much is still to be learned. With that in mind, one might expect the treatment of uncertainty to be quite advanced in interdependent infrastructure models, but we find that to not be the case. In this work, we identify, define, and describe two key classes of uncertainty: system uncertainty and modeling uncertainty. System uncertainty is inherent in all complex infrastructure systems and possesses several subclasses (e.g., physical uncertainty and operational uncertainty). Modeling uncertainty occurs when researchers downscale a complex system to a mathematical or other symbolic representation. It too has several subclasses (e.g., parameter uncertainty and completeness uncertainty). We then identify how the literature to date treats uncertainty with respect to each type of uncertainty. While some work has investigated the implications of physical and temporal uncertainty, by and large, most types of uncertainty have had minimal exploration, suggesting significant knowledge gaps. Finally, we suggest a path forward for treatment and discussion of uncertainty, including what can be learned from other fields involving complex interdependent systems.

Availability note (English)

Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2021.107756

Additional details

Identifiers

DOI
10.1016/j.ress.2021.107756;
PII
S0951832021002854;

Publishing Information

Journal Title
Reliability Engineering and System Safety
Journal Volume
213
Journal Page Range
vp.
ISSN
0951-8320
CODEN
RESSEP

INIS

Country of Publication
United Kingdom
Country of Input or Organization
International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
INIS RN
54018229
Subject category
S42: ENGINEERING;
Descriptors DEI
ACCIDENTS; COMPUTERIZED SIMULATION; NATURAL DISASTERS; REVIEWS
Descriptors DEC
DOCUMENT TYPES; SIMULATION

Optional Information

Copyright
Copyright (c) 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.