Optimization of STEM tomography acquisition - A comparison of convergent beam and parallel beam STEM tomography
- 1. Central Facility of Electron Microscopy, Ulm University, Albert-Einstein-Allee 11, D-89081 Ulm (Germany)
Description
In this paper two imaging modes in a state-of-the-art scanning transmission electron microscope (STEM) are compared: conventional STEM with a convergent beam (referred to as nanoprobe) and STEM with a parallel beam (referred to as microprobe). The effect and influence of both modes with respect to their depth of field are investigated. Tomograms of a human white blood cell (hemophagocytes) are acquired, aligned, and evaluated. It is shown that STEM using a parallel beam produces tomograms with fewer distortions and artifacts that allows resolving finer features. Microprobe STEM tomography is advantageous especially in life science, when semi-thin sections (approximately 0.5 μm thick) of biological samples are imaged at relatively low magnification with a large field of view.
Availability note (English)
Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ultramic.2010.05.008Additional details
Identifiers
- DOI
- 10.1016/j.ultramic.2010.05.008;
- PII
- S0304-3991(10)00155-5;
Publishing Information
- Journal Title
- Ultramicroscopy (Amsterdam)
- Journal Volume
- 110
- Journal Issue
- 9
- Journal Page Range
- p. 1231-1237
- ISSN
- 0304-3991
- CODEN
- ULTRD6
INIS
- Country of Publication
- Netherlands
- Country of Input or Organization
- International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
- INIS RN
- 44102950
- Subject category
- S60: APPLIED LIFE SCIENCES;
- Descriptors DEI
- BLOOD CELLS; COMPARATIVE EVALUATIONS; HUMAN POPULATIONS; OPTIMIZATION; RESOLUTION; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; TOMOGRAPHY; TRANSMISSION ELECTRON MICROSCOPY
- Descriptors DEC
- BIOLOGICAL MATERIALS; BLOOD; BODY FLUIDS; DIAGNOSTIC TECHNIQUES; ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; EVALUATION; MATERIALS; MICROSCOPY; POPULATIONS
Optional Information
- Copyright
- Copyright (c) 2010 Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam, The Netherlands, All rights reserved.