Published September 15, 2016 | Version v1
Journal article

Environmental impact of heavy pig production in a sample of Italian farms. A cradle to farm-gate analysis

  • 1. Council for Agricultural Research and Economics, Fodder and Dairy Production Research Centre, Via A. Lombardo 11, 26900 Lodi (Italy)
  • 2. Council for Agricultural Research and Economics, Research Unit for Swine Husbandry, Via Beccastecca 345, San Cesario sul Panaro, 41018 (Italy)
  • 3. ENEA, Italian National Agency for New Technologies, Energy and Sustainable Economic Development, Via Martiri di Monte Sole 4, 40129 Bologna (Italy)
  • 4. Associazione Regionale Allevatori dell'Emilia Romagna, Via Roma 89/2—Loc. Viadagola, 40057 Granarolo dell'Emilia (Italy)
  • 5. LCA-lab SRL, Bologna (Italy)

Description

Four breeding piggeries and eight growing-fattening piggeries were analyzed to estimate potential environmental impacts of heavy pig production (> 160 kg of live height at slaughtering). Life Cycle Assessment methodology was adopted in the study, considering a system from breeding phase to growing fattening phase. Environmental impacts of breeding phase and growing-fattening phase were accounted separately and then combined to obtain the impacts of heavy pig production. The functional unit was 1 kg of live weight gain. Impact categories investigated were global warming (GW), acidification (AC), eutrophication (EU), abiotic depletion (AD), and photochemical ozone formation (PO). The total environmental impact of 1 kg of live weight gain was 3.3 kg CO2eq, 4.9 E − 2 kg SO2eq, 3.1 E − 2 kg PO43− eq, 3.7 E − 3 kg Sbeq, 1.7 E − 3 kg C2H4eq for GW, AC, EU, AD, and PO respectively. Feed production was the main hotspot in all impact categories. Greenhouse gases responsible for GW were mainly CH4, N2O, and CO2. Ammonia was the most important source of AC, sharing about 90%. Nitrate and NH3 were the main emissions responsible for EU, whereas P and NOx showed minor contributions. Crude oil and natural gas consumption was the main source of AD. A large spectrum of pollutants had a significant impact on PO: they comprised CH4 from manure fermentation, CO2 caused by fossil fuel combustion in agricultural operations and industrial processes, ethane and propene emitted during oil extraction and refining, and hexane used in soybean oil extraction. The farm characteristics that best explained the results were fundamentally connected with performance indicators Farms showed a wide variability of results, meaning that there was wide margin for improving the environmental performance of either breeding or growing-fattening farms. The effectiveness of some mitigation measures was evaluated and the results that could be obtained by their introduction have been presented. - Highlights: • Pig production has relevant effects on water and air quality, global warming and natural resource depletion. • An LCA was performed on the production of heavy pig (> 160 kg of body weight) production. • There is a wide variability of environmental performances among farms. • It is shown that there is wide margin of reduction of environmental impact of heavy pig production.

Availability note (English)

Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.04.174

Additional details

Identifiers

DOI
10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.04.174;
PII
S0048-9697(16)30873-7;

Publishing Information

Journal Title
Science of the Total Environment
Journal Volume
565
Journal Page Range
p. 576-585
ISSN
0048-9697
CODEN
STENDL

Optional Information

Copyright
Copyright (c) 2016 Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam, The Netherlands, All rights reserved.