The academic radiography workforce: Age profile, succession planning and academic development
- 1. University of Exeter, Exeter (United Kingdom)
- 2. London Southbank University, London (United Kingdom)
- 3. University of Portsmouth, Portsmouth (United Kingdom)
- 4. University of Salford, Salford (United Kingdom)
Description
Introduction: Academia is one area of practice in which radiographers can specialise; they compile approximately 2% of the total radiography profession in the UK, but are highly influential and essential for the education and development of the workforce in addition to undertaking research. However, the academic environment is very different to clinical practice and a period of transition is required. Methods: Data were collated to explore the age and retirement profile of the academic radiography workforce in the UK; to understand the research time allocated to this workforce; the time required to develop a clinical radiographer into an academic and the mentorship and succession planning provisions nationally. An online UK wide survey was conducted and sent to all 24 Universities delivering radiography education within the UK. Results: Eighteen out of 24 Universities in the UK responded to the survey. Approximately 30% of radiography academics are due to retire over the next 10 years, with over 25% of radiographers who currently hold a doctorate qualification included within this figure. Those entering academia have notably lower qualifications as a group than those who are due to retire. Developing clinical radiographers into academics was thought to take 1–3 years on average, or longer if they are required to undertake research. Conclusion: There is vulnerability in the academic radiography workforce. Higher education institutions need to invest in developing the academic workforce to maintain research and educational expertise, which is underpinned by master's and doctorate level qualifications. - Highlights: • Approximately 30% of radiography academics are due to retire over the next 10 years. • Over 25% of radiographers who currently hold a doctorate qualification included due to retire within 10 years. • Those entering academia have significantly lower qualifications as a group than those who are due to retire. • There is vulnerability in the academic radiography workforce. • Universities need to invest in developing the academic workforce to maintain research and educational expertise.
Availability note (English)
Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.radi.2017.05.012Additional details
Identifiers
- DOI
- 10.1016/j.radi.2017.05.012;
- PII
- S1078-8174(17)30069-X;
Publishing Information
- Journal Title
- Radiography (London 1995)
- Journal Volume
- 23
- Journal Issue
- Supplement 1
- Journal Page Range
- p. S48-S52
- ISSN
- 1078-8174
INIS
- Country of Publication
- United Kingdom
- Country of Input or Organization
- International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
- INIS RN
- 49049825
- Subject category
- S96: KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT AND PRESERVATION;
- Descriptors DEI
- EDUCATION; EDUCATIONAL FACILITIES; OCCUPATIONS; PUBLIC OPINION; RADIOLOGICAL PERSONNEL; VULNERABILITY
- Descriptors DEC
- MEDICAL PERSONNEL; PERSONNEL
Optional Information
- Copyright
- Copyright (c) 2017 Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam, The Netherlands, All rights reserved.