Published June 2014 | Version v1
Journal article

SU-E-T-347: Validation of the Condensed History Algorithm of Geant4 Using the Fano Test

  • 1. The Univerity of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX (United States)

Description

Purpose: To validate the condensed history algorithm and physics of the Geant4 Monte Carlo toolkit for simulations of ionization chambers (ICs). This study is the first step to validate Geant4 for calculations of photon beam quality correction factors under the presence of a strong magnetic field for magnetic resonance guided linac system applications. Methods: The electron transport and boundary crossing algorithms of Geant4 version 9.6.p02 were tested under Fano conditions using the Geant4 example/application FanoCavity. User-defined parameters of the condensed history and multiple scattering algorithms were investigated under Fano test conditions for three scattering models (physics lists): G4UrbanMscModel95 (PhysListEmStandard-option3), G4GoudsmitSaundersonMsc (PhysListEmStandard-GS), and G4WentzelVIModel/G4CoulombScattering (PhysListEmStandard-WVI). Simulations were conducted using monoenergetic photon beams, ranging from 0.5 to 7 MeV and emphasizing energies from 0.8 to 3 MeV. Results: The GS and WVI physics lists provided consistent Fano test results (within ±0.5%) for maximum step sizes under 0.01 mm at 1.25 MeV, with improved performance at 3 MeV (within ±0.25%). The option3 physics list provided consistent Fano test results (within ±0.5%) for maximum step sizes above 1 mm. Optimal parameters for the option3 physics list were 10 km maximum step size with default values for other user-defined parameters: 0.2 dRoverRange, 0.01 mm final range, 0.04 range factor, 2.5 geometrical factor, and 1 skin. Simulations using the option3 physics list were ∼70 – 100 times faster compared to GS and WVI under optimal parameters. Conclusion: This work indicated that the option3 physics list passes the Fano test within ±0.5% when using a maximum step size of 10 km for energies suitable for IC calculations in a 6 MV spectrum without extensive computational times. Optimal user-defined parameters using the option3 physics list will be used in future IC simulations to calculate beam quality correction factors under the presence of a magnetic field. Elekta-MD Anderson Research Agreement

Additional details

Identifiers

Publishing Information

Journal Title
Medical Physics
Journal Volume
41
Journal Issue
6
Journal Page Range
p. 304
ISSN
0094-2405
CODEN
MPHYA6

INIS

Country of Publication
United States
Country of Input or Organization
International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
INIS RN
46061068
Subject category
S46: INSTRUMENTATION RELATED TO NUCLEAR SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY;
Descriptors DEI
ALGORITHMS; CORRECTIONS; LINEAR ACCELERATORS; MONTE CARLO METHOD; MULTIPLE SCATTERING; PERFORMANCE; PHOTON BEAMS; SIMULATION
Descriptors DEC
ACCELERATORS; BEAMS; CALCULATION METHODS; MATHEMATICAL LOGIC; SCATTERING

Optional Information

Notes
(c) 2014 American Association of Physicists in Medicine