Published August 2013 | Version v1
Journal article

Evaluation of choices for sustainable rural electrification in developing countries: A multicriteria approach

  • 1. Rural Electrification Board (REB), System Operation Management, Dhaka-1344 (Bangladesh)
  • 2. Department of Energy Technology, Aalto University School of Engineering, FI-0076 (Finland)

Description

Rural electrification (RE) can be modelled as a multifactorial task connected to a large number of variables: decision makers need to choose the appropriate options by considering not only the techno-economic competitiveness but also socio-cultural dynamics and environmental consequences, making the task intricate. Many rural electrification projects have failed due to lack of attention to the issues beyond financial and technical dimensions. This paper presents a standardized approach for decision making concerning the extension of electricity services to rural areas. This approach first determines whether the supply provision should be grid expansion or off-grid on the basis of levelized cost of delivered electricity. If the grid expansion is found nonviable over off-grid options then a multicriteria decision aiding tool, SMAA-2 (Stochastic Multicriteria Acceptability Analysis), will evaluate off-grid technologies by aggregating 24 criteria values. While applying this approach, the delivered costs of electricity by the grid in remote areas within the 1–25 km distances vary in a range of 0.10–7.85 US$/kW h depending on the line lengths and load conditions. In the off-grid evaluation, the solar PV (photovoltaic) and biogas plants are found as the most preferable alternatives with 59% and 41% acceptability in their first rank, respectively. - Highlights: • Rural electrification involves a large number of socio-cultural issues in addition to technical and environmental considerations. • Decision makers need to choose the appropriate options by considering many criteria. • Many off-grid projects failed due to noncomplying of societal issues. • Multicriteria based decision choice can safeguard the projects from these issues. • SMAA analysis can select the alternatives based on merits

Availability note (English)

Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2013.04.017

Additional details

Identifiers

DOI
10.1016/j.enpol.2013.04.017;
PII
S0301-4215(13)00256-5;

Publishing Information

Journal Title
Energy Policy
Journal Volume
59
Journal Page Range
p. 589-599
ISSN
0301-4215
CODEN
ENPYAC

INIS

Country of Publication
United Kingdom
Country of Input or Organization
International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
INIS RN
46025318
Subject category
S29: ENERGY PLANNING, POLICY AND ECONOMY;
Descriptors DEI
DECISION MAKING; DEVELOPING COUNTRIES; ECONOMICS; ELECTRICITY; METHANE; PHOTOVOLTAIC POWER PLANTS; POWER SUPPLIES; REMOTE AREAS; RURAL AREAS
Descriptors DEC
ALKANES; ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT; EQUIPMENT; HYDROCARBONS; ORGANIC COMPOUNDS; POWER PLANTS; SOLAR POWER PLANTS

Optional Information

Copyright
Copyright (c) 2013 Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam, The Netherlands, All rights reserved.