Published July 1995 | Version v1
Report Open

Cost-benefit analysis for U.S. NRC proposed radiological criteria for decommissioning

Creators

  • 1. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC (United States)

Description

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission prepared cost-benefit analyses in support of the proposed regulation on radiological criteria for decommissioning. These analyses have been published in the Draft Generic Environmental Impact Statement (GEIS), NUREG-1496, and in the Draft Regulatory Analysis (RA). The method used was to first list the reasonable regulatory alternatives that could be considered. Second, for each regulatory alternative, we analyzed and compared the costs and the incremental radiological and non-radiological impacts to workers and members of the public. The regulatory alternatives for unrestricted use of a site that were analyzed and compared were: no regulatory change; a uniform risk based on total effective dose equivalent (TEDE); use of 'best' available technology; and returning the level of radioactivity attributable to licensed activity to background levels. The analyses were performed for ten types of reference facilities, and each facility was evaluated at low, medium, and high levels of contamination. The reference facilities included: reactors; various uranium and non-fuel cycle facilities; and independent spent fuel storage installations. Since both the radiological and non-radiological benefits were considered, the benefits of the various alternatives were measured in terms of 'Estimated Mortalities Averted.' Conclusions supported by the analyses were that a risk limit, expressed as a 15 mrem/y dose, is reasonable both as a level for protecting public health and safety and with regard to its cost-benefit effects. Further reductions on a site-specific application of the ALARA principle are also supported in the context of accounting for both the radiological and non-radiological effects in both the short and long terms. Restricted release is also supported when the same level of protection is provided in decommissioning those facilities that cannot reasonably meet the unrestricted release criteria. (J.P.N.)

Files

27028701.pdf

Files (124.8 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:cb49171fbb62304b1cb0fbbfe47f8eac
124.8 kB Preview Download
Part of:
Proceedings of the second workshop on residual radioactivity and recycling criteria jointly sponsored by the United States Environmental Protection Agency, the Office of Radiation and Indoor Air, and the Japan Atomic Energy Research Institute

Additional details

Publishing Information

Imprint Title
Proceedings of the second workshop on residual radioactivity and recycling criteria jointly sponsored by the United States Environmental Protection Agency, the Office of Radiation and Indoor Air, and the Japan Atomic Energy Research Institute
Imprint Pagination
366 p.
Journal Page Range
p. 75-79.
Report number
JAERI-Conf--95-015

Conference

Title
2. workshop on residual radioactivity and recycling criteria.
Dates
9-11 Nov 1994.
Place
Tokai, Ibaraki (Japan).

Optional Information