Published 2024 | Version v1
Journal article

Reappraising imaging features of pancreatic acinar cystic transformation: be aware of differential diagnoses

  • 1. Centre of Research on Inflammation, INSERM, Paris (France)
  • 2. Department of Pancreatology and Digestive Oncology, Beaujon University Hospital (APHP), CRMR PaRaDis Pancreatic Rare Diseases, Université Paris Cité, Clichy (France)
  • 3. Department of Radiology, Beaujon University Hospital (APHP), Université Paris Cité, Clichy (France)
  • 4. Department of Pathology, Beaujon University Hospital (APHP), Université Paris Cité, Clichy (France)

Description

Imaging features of pancreatic acinar cystic transformation (ACT) have been published. We aimed to describe the clinical and radiological characteristics of patients with a presumed pancreatic ACT diagnosis, reappraising the value of these published imaging criteria. Single-center retrospective study (2003-2021) of consecutive patients with a presumed diagnosis of ACT as suggested by the local expert multidisciplinary case review board. Patients without available imaging (CT or MRI) for review were excluded. Patients were classified into "certain" ACT (if ≥ 2 imaging criteria and no differential diagnosis) or "uncertain" ACT (if ≥ 1 imaging criteria and suggested differential diagnoses). Sixty-four patients (35 males, [55%]) were included. ACT was considered "certain" for 34 patients (53%) and "uncertain" for 30 patients (47%). The number of ACT criteria did not differ between groups, with 91.2% of patients with ≥ 3 ACT imaging criteria in the "certain" group vs 93.3% in the "uncertain" group (p = 0.88). In the "uncertain" group, the main suggested differentials were branch-duct intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (18/30 patients, 60%), calcifying chronic pancreatitis (8/30 patients, 27%), both (three patients, 10%) and serous cystadenoma (one patient, 3%). Calcifications were significantly more frequent in the "uncertain" group (89% vs 63% in the "certain" group, p = 0.02). Published ACT imaging criteria are frequently associated with features suggesting differential diagnoses. They appear insufficient to reach a final diagnosis in a subset of patients. ACT displays a heterogeneous morphological imaging presentation challenging the non-invasive diagnostic work-up. Physicians' and radiologists' awareness of this entity is important to better understand its natural history and improve non-invasive diagnostic criteria.

Availability note (English)

Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-024-10823-3

Additional details

Identifiers

Publishing Information

Journal Title
European Radiology (Internet)
Journal Volume
34
Journal Issue
12
Journal Page Range
p. 7650-7658
ISSN
1432-1084
CODEN
EURAE3