Published November 2015 | Version v1
Journal article

Thresholds for domino effects and safety distances in the process industry: A review of approaches and regulations

  • 1. LISES – Dipartimento di Ingegneria Civile, Chimica, Ambientale e dei Materiali, Alma Mater Studiorum – Università di Bologna, via Terracini n.28, 40131 Bologna (Italy)
  • 2. LITIS – EA 4108, Université du Havre – Normandie Université, 25 rue Ph. Lebon, 76058 Le Havre (France)
  • 3. LSPC – EA 4704 INSA de Rouen – Normandie Université, Avenue de l'Université, 76801 St. Étienne du Rouvray (France)
  • 4. Centre for Economics and Corporate Sustainability, KU Leuven, Campus Brussels, 1000 Brussels (Belgium)
  • 5. Antwerp Research Group on Safety and Security (ARGoSS), University of Antwerp, Prinsstraat 13, 2000 Antwerpen (Belgium)
  • 6. Safety and Security Science Group, Faculty TBM, TU Delft, Jaffalaan 5, 2628 BX Delft (Netherlands)

Description

Domino effects resulting in cascading events in the chemical and process industries are well known causes of severe accident scenarios. Although the threats due to domino effects are recognized since at least three decades, this is still a controversial topic when coming to its assessment. A number of different approaches are proposed in technical standards and in the scientific literature. The present contribution aims at providing a critical revision of the procedure for the identification of domino effect scenarios. An overview of current regulations for domino effect assessment is provided. The criteria resulting from the regulations are compared and discussed in the light of recent developments concerning escalation hazards and safety distance assessments. - Highlights: • Definition and approach to the domino effect assessment in EU member states (MS) were analyzed. • A survey on criteria to identify domino hazard in eight EU MS was carried out. • Threshold criteria for the assessment of domino scenarios were critically compared. • Important differences in requirements concerning the domino effect are present in EU MS. • Agreement on escalation thresholds may improve protection from domino scenarios

Availability note (English)

Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2015.04.007

Additional details

Identifiers

DOI
10.1016/j.ress.2015.04.007;
PII
S0951-8320(15)00119-2;

Publishing Information

Journal Title
Reliability Engineering and System Safety
Journal Volume
143
Journal Page Range
p. 74-84
ISSN
0951-8320
CODEN
RESSEP

INIS

Country of Publication
United Kingdom
Country of Input or Organization
International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
INIS RN
47019686
Subject category
S42: ENGINEERING;
Descriptors DEI
CHEMICAL INDUSTRY; COMPARATIVE EVALUATIONS; DAMAGE; HAZARDS; HYPOTHETICAL ACCIDENTS; INDUSTRIAL ACCIDENTS; REGULATIONS; REVIEWS; RISK ASSESSMENT; SAFETY; SAFETY ANALYSIS
Descriptors DEC
ACCIDENTS; DOCUMENT TYPES; EVALUATION; INDUSTRY; LAWS

Optional Information

Copyright
Copyright (c) 2015 Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam, The Netherlands, All rights reserved.