Published March 2014 | Version v1
Journal article

Comparison of acetabular version angle measurements between prone and reformatted supine computed tomography images

  • 1. Changi General Hospital, Department of Radiology, Singapore (Singapore)
  • 2. Singapore General Hospital, Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Singapore (Singapore)

Description

To compare acetabular version angle measurements of CT scans in the prone and reformatted supine positions. CT acetabular version angle measurements have previously been done in the prone position to correct for pelvic tilt. With the advent of multidetector CT, recent studies have evaluated acetabular version angles measured in the supine position. To our knowledge, a comparison between these two approaches has not been performed. Case series in which consecutive CT urography studies of 49 adult patients performed in both prone and supine positions were retrospectively reviewed, and acetabular version angles of both hips measured. Retrospective review of 49 consecutive CT urography studies performed in both prone and supine positions was done, and acetabular version angles of both hips were measured. Two radiologists measured the acetabular version angles independently. Multiplanar reformation of the supine CT images was performed to compensate for pelvic tilt and rotation prior to angle measurements. There was excellent interobserver agreement between the two readers (ICC = 0.90). Acetabular version angle measurements from the prone CT images were larger compared to reformatted supine images (24.0 and 21.3 , respectively, p < 0.0001), with greater angles found in women. There was strong correlation between supine and prone acetabular version angle measurements with a Pearson correlation coefficient of 0.743. Acetabular version angles measured from prone and reformatted supine CT images show strong correlation but are significantly different with larger angles obtained from the former and in women; clinical implications of these findings may require further study in other to determine the best method of version angle measurement. CT acetabular version angle measurement is also reliable with excellent interobserver correlation. (orig.)

Availability note (English)

Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00256-013-1781-6

Additional details

Identifiers

Publishing Information

Journal Title
Skeletal Radiology
Journal Volume
43
Journal Issue
3
Journal Page Range
p. 289-295
ISSN
0364-2348
CODEN
SKRADI

INIS

Country of Publication
Germany
Country of Input or Organization
Germany
INIS RN
45040191
Subject category
S62: RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE;
Descriptors DEI
BONE JOINTS; COMPARATIVE EVALUATIONS; COMPUTERIZED TOMOGRAPHY; CORRELATIONS; FEMALES; FEMUR; MALES; PATIENTS; PELVIS; POSITIONING; SKELETAL DISEASES
Descriptors DEC
BODY; DIAGNOSTIC TECHNIQUES; DISEASES; EVALUATION; ORGANS; SKELETON; TOMOGRAPHY