Published August 2016 | Version v1
Journal article

Optimal inspection-based preventive maintenance policy for three-state mechanical components under competing failure modes

  • 1. Department of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, The University of Nottingham, Nottingham (United Kingdom)
  • 2. College of Electrical Engineering, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou (China)

Description

The degradation of mechanical components is non-stationary and their degradation level can only be detected through offline discrete inspection in most cases. Aiming at the effect of the non-stationary feature and the delay of state detection caused by discrete inspection on long-run operation cost, this paper focuses on proposing an optimal inspection-based maintenance policy for three-state mechanical components subject to competing failure modes. A double-Wiener-process degradation model is established to describe the two operation states, which includes two Wiener process models under the same law but with different parameters. In addition, a preventive maintenance policy including a degradation threshold, an age threshold and a degradation control limit are adopted. A five-scenario probability-based model is proposed to describe the state evolution during one inspection interval and then the analytical model of the impact of delay on detecting state-transition and degradation-level on preventive maintenance policy is proposed. An optimization model of an inspection- based maintenance is established. Finally, sensitivity analysis in terms of the decision variables for state-transition time distribution and parameters in wear-out state is carried out based on numerical examples and the efficiency and superiority of the proposed policy is demonstrated by comparing with the current two-state maintenance policy. - Highlights: • An optimal PM policy for components under competing failure modes is proposed. • The degradation is modeled by Wiener process and compound Poisson process. • Age threshold and degradation level are used to trigger maintenance actions. • Five possible scenarios during one inspection interval are presented. • Sensitivity analysis of optimal variables are carried out to verify the advancement.

Availability note (English)

Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2016.02.007

Additional details

Identifiers

DOI
10.1016/j.ress.2016.02.007;
PII
S0951-8320(16)00048-X;

Publishing Information

Journal Title
Reliability Engineering and System Safety
Journal Volume
152
Journal Page Range
p. 95-103
ISSN
0951-8320
CODEN
RESSEP

INIS

Country of Publication
United Kingdom
Country of Input or Organization
International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
INIS RN
48005084
Subject category
S42: ENGINEERING;
Descriptors DEI
COMPARATIVE EVALUATIONS; CONTROL; FAILURES; INSPECTION; MAINTENANCE; OPERATION; OPTIMIZATION; PERIODICITY; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; WEAR
Descriptors DEC
EVALUATION; VARIATIONS

Optional Information

Copyright
Copyright (c) 2016 Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam, The Netherlands, All rights reserved.