Published July 1992
| Version v1
Journal article
Should 60Co tissue-air ratios be re-evaluated?
Description
This note has shown that, in contrast with the claims of the Bjaerngard work (1988,1989), there is no inconsistency in defining a normalized tissue-air ratio (TAR) at depth of maximum build-up, dm, and zero field size. The adjustment to the Bjaerngard equations necessary to demonstrate this means that published TAR for non-zero field sizes should be increased by about 3%. Two of the difficulties in using this approach are (i) the problem of dealing with a TAR defined at zero depth, as opposed to dm, and (ii) the non-linearity of TAR plots at constant values of S/d. These are discussed. (author)
Additional details
Publishing Information
- Journal Title
- Physics in Medicine and Biology
- Journal Volume
- 37
- Journal Issue
- 7
- Series
- Phys. Med. Biol.
- Journal Page Range
- 1601-1610
- ISSN
- 0031-9155
- CODEN
- PHMBA
INIS
- Country of Publication
- United Kingdom
- Country of Input or Organization
- United Kingdom
- INIS RN
- 23083081
- Subject category
- S61: RADIATION PROTECTION AND DOSIMETRY;
- Descriptors DEI
- AIR; COBALT 60; DEPTH DOSE DISTRIBUTIONS; ENERGY DEPOSITION; ERRORS; GAMMA DOSIMETRY; GAMMA RADIATION; KERMA; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; TISSUES
- Descriptors DEC
- BETA DECAY RADIOISOTOPES; BETA-MINUS DECAY RADIOISOTOPES; BODY; COBALT ISOTOPES; DISTRIBUTION; DOSIMETRY; ELECTROMAGNETIC RADIATION; FLUIDS; GASES; INTERMEDIATE MASS NUCLEI; INTERNAL CONVERSION RADIOISOTO; IONIZING RADIATIONS; ISOMERIC TRANSITION ISOTOPES; ISOTOPES; MINUTES LIVING RADIOISOTOPES; NUCLEI; ODD-ODD NUCLEI; RADIATION DOSE DISTRIBUTIONS; RADIATIONS; RADIOISOTOPES; SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION; SPATIAL DOSE DISTRIBUTIONS; YEARS LIVING RADIOISOTOPES