Assessment of colorectal liver metastases using MRI and CT: Impact of observer experience on diagnostic performance and inter-observer reproducibility with histopathological correlation
Creators
- 1. University Hospital Frankfurt, Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60590 Frankfurt am Main (Germany)
- 2. University Hospital Frankfurt, Department of General and Visceral Surgery, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60590 Frankfurt am Main (Germany)
- 3. Barts and the London, Queen Mary University of London, Mile End Road, London E1 4NS (United Kingdom)
- 4. University Hospital Frankfurt, Department of Biostatistics and Medical Information, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60590 Frankfurt am Main (Germany)
Description
Highlights: • We investigate the impact of experience on CT and MRI reporting of colorectal liver metastases. • Diagnostic quality is significantly influenced by observer experience for both CT and MRI. • MRI is more affected by experience than CT when reporting cases of colorectal liver metastases. - Abstract: Introduction: To compare the diagnostic performance and inter-observer reproducibility of CT and MRI in detecting colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) of observers with different levels of experience. Materials and methods: Data from 51 CT and 54 MRI examinations of 105 patients with CRLM were analysed. Intraoperative and histopathological findings served as the reference standard. Analyses were performed by four observers with varying levels of experience regarding imaging of CRLM (reviewers A, B, C and D with respectively >20, >5, <1 and 0 years of experience). Per-segment sensitivity, specificity, Cohen's kappa (κ) for diagnosed segments and Intra-class Correlation Coefficients (ICC) for reported number of lesions were calculated. Results: CT sensitivity and specificity was for reviewer A 89.71%/94.41%, B 78.50%/88.37%, C 63.55%/85.58%, D 84.11%/78.60% and regarding MRI A 90.40%/95.43%, B 74.40%/90.04%, C 60.00%/85.89% and D 65.60%/75.90%. The overall inter-observer agreement was higher for CT (κ = 0.43, p < 0.001; ICC = 0.75, p < 0.001) than MRI (κ = 0.38, p < 0.001; ICC = 0.65, p < 0.001). The experienced reviewers A and B achieved better agreement for MRI (κ = 0.54, p < 0.001; ICC = 0.77, p < 0.001) than CT (κ = 0.52, p < 0.00; ICC = 0.76, p < 0.001) unlike the less experienced C and D (MRI κ = 0.38, ICC = 0.63 and CT κ = 0.41, ICC = 0.74, respectively, p < 0.001). Conclusions: The proficiency in detection of CRLM is significantly influenced by observer experience, although CT interpretation is less affected than MRI analysis
Availability note (English)
Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2014.07.005Additional details
Identifiers
- DOI
- 10.1016/j.ejrad.2014.07.005;
- PII
- S0720-048X(14)00357-X;
Publishing Information
- Journal Title
- European Journal of Radiology
- Journal Volume
- 83
- Journal Issue
- 10
- Journal Page Range
- p. 1752-1758
- ISSN
- 0720-048X
- CODEN
- EJRADR
INIS
- Country of Publication
- Netherlands
- Country of Input or Organization
- International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
- INIS RN
- 47005373
- Subject category
- S62: RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE;
- Descriptors DEI
- BIOMEDICAL RADIOGRAPHY; COMPARATIVE EVALUATIONS; COMPUTERIZED TOMOGRAPHY; CORRELATIONS; DETECTION; DIAGNOSIS; LIVER; METASTASES; NMR IMAGING; PATIENTS; SENSITIVITY; SPECIFICITY
- Descriptors DEC
- BODY; DIAGNOSTIC TECHNIQUES; DIGESTIVE SYSTEM; EVALUATION; GLANDS; MEDICINE; NUCLEAR MEDICINE; ORGANS; RADIOLOGY; TOMOGRAPHY
Optional Information
- Copyright
- Copyright (c) 2014 Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam, The Netherlands, All rights reserved.