A new approach to determine maintenance periods of the most critical hydroelectric power plant equipment
Creators
- 1. Department of Industrial Engineering, Kırıkkale University, Kırıkkale, 71451 (Turkey)
Description
Highlights: • This study carried out for determining the maintenance periods in the hydroelectric power plants will provide a new perspective. • Maintenance cost coefficient and weibull distribution parameters are applied for the problem. • MCDM based reliability analysis is used for the first time in the literature. • It was observed that 16 critical equipment had no failures during the 1-year monitoring period. Power plants are large-scale generation facilities with high investment costs established to ensure sustainable energy supply. Maintenance-Repair activities constitute the most critical process to be considered in these facilities. Because, these activities cause planned or unplanned generation interruptions. For this reason, it is of great importance to calculate the maintenance periods determined on the basis of equipment health in the power plants. From this point of view in this study, the problem of determining maintenance periods is handled in the big scale hydroelectric power plant in Turkey. Due to the complexity of problem environment particularly including 16 equipment groups with the highest level of criticality on the power plant, proposing combined multi criteria decision making model (MCDM) has become invaluable for the purpose of reaching convincing outcomes. In order to obtain maximum benefit, investigation for appropriate probability distributions of 11-year failure and repair data belonging to the equipment group and analyses for reliability, availability and maintainability analyses are performed for 16 critical equipment groups. Finally, maintenance periods for 16 equipment groups were calculated using the curve family formed by the cost coefficient of Weibull distribution parameters. On the specified maintenance days based on system reliability and maintenance costs, it was observed that 16 critical equipment had no failures during the 1-year monitoring process. This indicates a 100% improvement.
Availability note (English)
Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2020.107238Additional details
Identifiers
- DOI
- 10.1016/j.ress.2020.107238;
- PII
- S0951832020307389;
Publishing Information
- Journal Title
- Reliability Engineering and System Safety
- Journal Volume
- 205
- Journal Page Range
- vp.
- ISSN
- 0951-8320
- CODEN
- RESSEP
INIS
- Country of Publication
- United Kingdom
- Country of Input or Organization
- International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
- INIS RN
- 54018565
- Subject category
- S13: HYDRO ENERGY; S42: ENGINEERING;
- Descriptors DEI
- DECISION MAKING; HYDROELECTRIC POWER PLANTS; INVESTMENT; MONITORING; REPAIR
- Descriptors DEC
- POWER PLANTS
Optional Information
- Copyright
- Copyright (c) 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.