Thermodynamics of finite systems: a key issues review

A little over ten years ago, Campisi, and Dunkel and Hilbert, published papers claiming that the Gibbs (volume) entropy of a classical system was correct, and that the Boltzmann (surface) entropy was not. They claimed further that the quantum version of the Gibbs entropy was also correct, and that the phenomenon of negative temperatures was thermodynamically inconsistent. Their work began a vigorous debate of exactly how the entropy, both classical and quantum, should be defined. The debate has called into question the basis of thermodynamics, along with fundamental ideas such as whether heat always flows from hot to cold. The purpose of this paper is to sum up the present status—admittedly from my point of view.

I will show that standard thermodynamics, with some minor generalizations, is correct, and the alternative thermodynamics suggested by Hilbert, Hänggi, and Dunkel is not. Heat does not flow from cold to hot. Negative temperatures are thermodynamically consistent. The small 'errors' in the Boltzmann entropy that started the whole debate are shown to be a consequence of the micro-canonical assumption of an energy distribution of zero width. Improved expressions for the entropy are found when this assumption is abandoned. (key issues review)