SU-F-T-267: A Clarkson-Based Independent Dose Verification for the Helical Tomotherapy
- 1. Juntendo University, Hongo, Tokyo (Japan)
- 2. Shonan Kamakura General Hospital, Kamakura, Kanagawa, (Japan)
- 3. Tsukuba University, Tsukuba, Ibaraki (Japan)
- 4. Kanagawa Cancer Center, Yokohama, Kanagawa (Japan)
- 5. Cancer Institute Hospital of Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Koto, Tokyo (Japan)
- 6. Shonan Fujisawa Tokushukai Hospital, Fujisawa, Kanagawa (Japan)
- 7. National Cancer Center, Kashiwa, Chiba (Japan)
Description
Purpose: There have been few reports for independent dose verification for Tomotherapy. We evaluated the accuracy and the effectiveness of an independent dose verification system for the Tomotherapy. Methods: Simple MU Analysis (SMU, Triangle Product, Ishikawa, Japan) was used as the independent verification system and the system implemented a Clarkson-based dose calculation algorithm using CT image dataset. For dose calculation in the SMU, the Tomotherapy machine-specific dosimetric parameters (TMR, Scp, OAR and MLC transmission factor) were registered as the machine beam data. Dose calculation was performed after Tomotherapy sinogram from DICOM-RT plan information was converted to the information for MU and MLC location at more segmented control points. The performance of the SMU was assessed by a point dose measurement in non-IMRT and IMRT plans (simple target and mock prostate plans). Subsequently, 30 patients' treatment plans for prostate were compared. Results: From the comparison, dose differences between the SMU and the measurement were within 3% for all cases in non-IMRT plans. In the IMRT plan for the simple target, the differences (Average±1SD) were −0.70±1.10% (SMU vs. TPS), −0.40±0.10% (measurement vs. TPS) and −1.20±1.00% (measurement vs. SMU), respectively. For the mock prostate, the differences were −0.40±0.60% (SMU vs. TPS), −0.50±0.90% (measurement vs. TPS) and −0.90±0.60% (measurement vs. SMU), respectively. For patients' plans, the difference was −0.50±2.10% (SMU vs. TPS). Conclusion: A Clarkson-based independent dose verification for the Tomotherapy can be clinically available as a secondary check with the similar tolerance level of AAPM Task group 114. This research is partially supported by Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development (AMED)
Additional details
Identifiers
- DOI
- 10.1118/1.4956407;
Publishing Information
- Journal Title
- Medical Physics
- Journal Volume
- 43
- Journal Issue
- 6
- Journal Page Range
- vp.
- ISSN
- 0094-2405
- CODEN
- MPHYA6
INIS
- Country of Publication
- United States
- Country of Input or Organization
- International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
- INIS RN
- 48097539
- Subject category
- S60: APPLIED LIFE SCIENCES; S61: RADIATION PROTECTION AND DOSIMETRY;
- Descriptors DEI
- COMPUTERIZED TOMOGRAPHY; CT-GUIDED RADIOTHERAPY; PROSTATE; RADIATION DOSES; VERIFICATION
- Descriptors DEC
- BODY; DIAGNOSTIC TECHNIQUES; DOSES; GLANDS; MALE GENITALS; MEDICINE; NUCLEAR MEDICINE; ORGANS; RADIOLOGY; RADIOTHERAPY; THERAPY; TOMOGRAPHY
Optional Information
- Notes
- (c) 2016 American Association of Physicists in Medicine