Published December 2018 | Version v1
Journal article

Cost-efficient multi-energy management with flexible complementarity strategy for energy internet

  • 1. Engineering Optimization and Smart Antenna Institute, Northeastern University at Qinhuangdao, Qinhuangdao 066004 (China)
  • 2. College of Information Science and Engineering, Northeastern University, Shenyang 110819 (China)

Description

Highlights: • A multi-energy management method with energy complementarity prosumers was proposed. • A multi-objective optimisation framework was developed to reduce total energy cost. • The economic impact of the energy complementarity strategy was investigated. • The new method could promote the sustainable development of the urban energy system. The increasing complexities of energy internet integrated with distributed renewable energy resources and multiple energy infrastructures require more effective multi-energy management method. The prosumers with multiparty interaction represent major potential contributors for comprehensively improving the energy efficiency and socioeconomic benefits. In this paper, a novel multi-energy management strategy based on the complementarity of multi-energy demand was proposed to explore optimal energy scheduling problems of prosumers. The residential prosumer with a multi-energy coupling matrix and the industrial prosumer with a resource-task network were formulated to optimise the local operations. Furthermore, a joint planning for the prosumers was developed to minimise the global operating costs, where the prosumers' interests in terms of the energy exchange process were formulated as a multi-objective optimisation problem based on the Pareto efficiency theory. In addition, an optimisation method that integrates the epsilon-constraint algorithm and the extreme points of the feasible solution space was proposed to obtain better and more diverse solutions. The proposed methodology was applied to an urban multi-energy system. Simulation results demonstrated that the proposed multi-energy management method could effectively solve the optimal energy scheduling problems. At the compromise solution point, cost reductions of 7% and 10% can be obtained by the two prosumers on a summer day, with cost reductions of 9% and 11% obtained on a winter day. The use of multi-energy management method could establish a win-win relationship for prosumers and generate substantial benefits for the whole system.

Availability note (English)

Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.09.152

Additional details

Identifiers

DOI
10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.09.152;
PII
S0306261918314624;

Publishing Information

Journal Title
Applied Energy
Journal Volume
231
Journal Page Range
p. 803-815
ISSN
0306-2619
CODEN
APENDX

INIS

Country of Publication
United Kingdom
Country of Input or Organization
International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
INIS RN
52114462
Subject category
S29: ENERGY PLANNING, POLICY AND ECONOMY;
Descriptors DEI
ALGORITHMS; ECONOMIC IMPACT; ENERGY DEMAND; ENERGY EFFICIENCY; ENERGY MANAGEMENT; ENERGY TRANSFER; OPERATING COST; OPTIMIZATION; PLANNING; RENEWABLE ENERGY SOURCES; SIMULATION; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT
Descriptors DEC
COST; DEMAND; EFFICIENCY; ENERGY SOURCES; MANAGEMENT; MATHEMATICAL LOGIC; RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT

Optional Information

Copyright
Copyright (c) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.