Published April 2021 | Version v1
Journal article

Degradation of ciprofloxacin using UV-based advanced removal processes: Comparison of persulfate-based advanced oxidation and sulfite-based advanced reduction processes

  • 1. KU Leuven, Department of Chemical Engineering, Process and Environmental Technology Lab, J. De Nayerlaan 5, B-2860 Sint-Katelijne-Waver (Belgium)
  • 2. KU Leuven, Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, Pharmaceutical Analysis, Herestraat 49, 3000 Leuven (Belgium)

Description

Highlights: • Comparison of SR-AOPs and ARPs for the degradation of ciprofloxacin • In-depth assessment of influential parameters and produced reactive species • Insight in the reaction mechanisms by studying the ciprofloxacin defluorination In this study, the degradation of ciprofloxacin (CIP) in wastewater was investigated using UV-based sulfate radical advanced oxidation processes (SR-AOP) and UV-based advanced reduction processes (ARP). More specifically, a comparison of the UV-based persulfate advanced oxidation process (the UV/PS process) and the UV-based sulfite advanced reduction process (the UV/sulfite process) was made. Considering the UV-based SR-AOPs, the UV/PS process was much more efficient than the UV-based peroxymonosulfate advanced oxidation process (the UV/PMS process), with pseudo first order reaction rate constants (kobs) of 0.752 and 0.145 min−1, respectively. For the UV-based ARPs, the UV/sulfite process was the most efficient, compared to the UV/sulfide and the UV/dithionite process (kobs of 0.269, 0.0157 and 0.0329 min−1, respectively). The optimal process parameters for both the UV/PS and the UV/sulfite process were determined and the contribution of the produced reactive species were identified. For the UV/PS process, maximal CIP degradation was found at pH 8, and both OH and SO4 were responsible for CIP degradation. For the UV/sulfite process, H and eaq were responsible for CIP degradation, with eaq being the predominant radical at pH 8.5. Although CIP degradation was much faster for the UV/PS process, the UV/sulfite process was determined to be much more efficient in the defluorination of CIP.

Availability note (English)

Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.144510

Additional details

Identifiers

DOI
10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.144510;
PII
S0048969720380414;

Publishing Information

Journal Title
Science of the Total Environment
Journal Volume
764
Journal Page Range
vp.
ISSN
0048-9697
CODEN
STENDL

INIS

Country of Publication
Netherlands
Country of Input or Organization
International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
INIS RN
54064196
Subject category
S54: ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES; S37: INORGANIC, ORGANIC, PHYSICAL AND ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY;
Descriptors DEI
OXIDATION; PERSULFATES; PH VALUE; REACTION KINETICS; SULFATES; SULFIDES; SULFITES; WASTE WATER
Descriptors DEC
CHALCOGENIDES; CHEMICAL REACTIONS; HYDROGEN COMPOUNDS; KINETICS; LIQUID WASTES; OXYGEN COMPOUNDS; SULFUR COMPOUNDS; WASTES; WATER

Optional Information

Copyright
Copyright (c) 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.