Published 2008 | Version v2
Conference paper Open

A Comparative Study on the Methodology of Quantitative Health Objectives

  • 1. FNC Technology, Seoul (Korea, Republic of)
  • 2. Korea Institute of Nuclear Safety, Daejeon (Korea, Republic of)

Description

The government policy on severe accident of nuclear power plant was issued on Aug. of 2001. A QHO (quantitative health objective) was proposed as a safety goal in the policy but there wasn't much study on what it means quantitatively this QHO. The QHO which can be represented as 0.1% early fatality due to an accident was adopted from the NRC safety goal and the consequence of this 0.1% early fatality for Korean NPPs hasn't been evaluated yet. Thus the technical basis and quantification procedures for these quantitative health objectives for domestic nuclear power plants need to be evaluated. In this paper we have assessed an acceptable risks based on the mortality of Koreans to compare with the QHO of government policy. Also we have surveyed how the foreign QHOs were developed and compared the results with our domestic objective.

Files

116정건효.pdf

Files (358.5 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:0c05799bfc4ce2471f9ccf2a63b10c90
358.5 kB Preview Download
Part of:
Proceedings of the Korean Nuclear Society Spring Meeting

Additional details

Publishing Information

Publisher
KNS
Imprint Place
Daejeon (Korea, Republic of)
Imprint Title
Proceedings of the KNS spring meeting
Imprint Pagination
2 p.

Conference

Title
2008 Spring Meeting of the Korean Nuclear Society
Dates
29-30 May 2008
Place
Gyeongju (Korea, Republic of)

INIS

Country of Publication
Korea, Republic of
Country of Input or Organization
Korea, Republic of
INIS RN
39109246
Subject category
S22: GENERAL STUDIES OF NUCLEAR REACTORS;
Resource subtype / Literary indicator
Conference, Non-conventional Literature
Descriptors DEI
COMPARATIVE EVALUATIONS; NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS; PUBLIC HEALTH; REACTOR ACCIDENTS; SAFETY
Descriptors DEC
ACCIDENTS; EVALUATION; NUCLEAR FACILITIES; POWER PLANTS; THERMAL POWER PLANTS

Optional Information

Notes
5 refs, 2 figs, 1 tab