Published September 2021 | Version v1
Journal article

Microplastics and other anthropogenic particles in Antarctica: Using penguins as biological samplers

  • 1. University of Coimbra, MARE - Marine and Environmental Sciences Centre, Department of Life Sciences, 3000-456 Coimbra (Portugal)
  • 2. VICARTE, Department of Conservation and Restoration, NOVA School of Science and Technology, NOVA University Lisbon, 2829-516 Monte da Caparica (Portugal)
  • 3. LAQV-REQUIMTE, Department of Conservation and Restoration, NOVA School of Science and Technology, NOVA University Lisbon, 2829-516 Monte da Caparica (Portugal)
  • 4. Departamento de Ecologia Evolutiva, Museo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales, CSIC, 28006 Madrid (Spain)
  • 5. Marine and Environmental Sciences Centre, NOVA School of Science and Technology, NOVA University Lisbon, 2829-516 Monte da Caparica (Portugal)
  • 6. British Antarctic Survey, Natural Environment Research Council, High Cross, Madingley Road, Cambridge CB3 0ET (United Kingdom)

Description

Highlights: • Anthropogenic particles were found in all three pygoscelid penguin species. • Thirty-five percent were microplastics; these were found in all species. • Fifty-five percent of the analysed particles were identified as cellulose fibres. • Polyethylene were the most common synthetic polymer. • Microplastics were widespread across years and colonies in Antarctic Peninsula. Microplastics (Pygoscelis adeliae), chinstrap (Pygoscelis antarcticus) and gentoo penguins (Pygoscelis papua) were selected to evaluate the occurrence of microplastics across the Antarctic Peninsula and Scotia Sea. Scat samples (used as a proxy of ingestion), were collected from breeding colonies over seven seasons between 2006 and 2016. Antarctic krill (Euphausia superba), present in scat samples, contributed 85%, 66% and 54% of the diet in terms of frequency of occurrence to the diet of Adélie, gentoo and chinstrap penguins, respectively. Microplastics were found in 15%, 28% and 29% scats of Adélie, chinstrap and gentoo penguin respectively. A total of 92 particles were extracted from the scats (n = 317) and 32% (n = 29) were chemically identified via micro-Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (μ-FTIR). From all the particles extracted, 35% were identified as microplastics, particularly polyethylene (80%) and polyester (10%). It was not possible to ascertain the identification of the remaining 10% of samples. Other anthropogenic particles were identified in 55% of samples, identified as cellulose fibres. The results show a similar frequency of occurrence of particles across all colonies, suggesting there is no particular point source for microplastic pollution in the Scotia Sea. Additionally, no clear temporal variation in the number of microplastics in penguins was observed. Overall, this study reveals the presence of microplastics across Antarctica, in three penguin species and offers evidence of other anthropogenic particles in high numbers. Further research is needed to better understand the spatio-temporal dynamics, fate and effect of microplastics on these ecosystems, and improve plastic pollution policies in Antarctica.

Availability note (English)

Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.147698

Additional details

Identifiers

DOI
10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.147698;
PII
S0048969721027698;

Publishing Information

Journal Title
Science of the Total Environment
Journal Volume
788
Journal Page Range
vp.
ISSN
0048-9697
CODEN
STENDL

Optional Information

Copyright
Copyright (c) 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.