A comparative evaluation of the CF:CS and CRS models in 210Pb chronological studies applied to hydrographic basins in Brazil
Creators
- 1. Departamento de Petrologia e Metalogenia, Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Av. 24-A No. 1515, C.P. 178, CEP 13506-900, Rio Claro, São Paulo (Brazil)
- 2. Departamento de Física Aplicada II, Universidad de Sevilla, Av. Reina Mercedes No. 2, 41012 Sevilla (Spain)
Description
The Constant Flux: Constant Sedimentation (CF:CS) and Constant Rate of Supply (CRS) of unsupported⧸excess 210Pb models have been applied to a 210Pb data set providing of eighteen sediments profiles sampled at four riverine systems occurring in Brazil, South America: Corumbataí River basin (S1=Site 1, São Paulo State), Atibaia River basin (S2=Site 2, São Paulo State), Ribeirão dos Bagres basin (S3=Site 3, São Paulo State) and Amazon River mouth (S4=Site 4, Amapá State). These sites were chosen for a comparative evaluation of the performance of the CF:CS and CRS models due to their pronounced differences on the geographical location, geological context, soil composition, biodiversity, climate, rainfall, and water flow regime, among other variable aspects. However, all sediments cores exhibited a common denominator consisting on a database built from the use of the same techniques for acquiring the sediments major chemical composition (SiO2, Al2O3, Na2O, K2O, CaO, MgO, Fe2O3, MnO, P2O5, TiO2 and LOI-Loss on Ignition) and unsupported⧸excess 210Pb activity data. In terms of sedimentation rates, the performance of the CRS model was better than that of the CF:CS model as it yielded values more compatible with those expected from field evidences. Under the chronological point of view, the CRS model always provided ages within the permitted range of the 210Pb-method in the studied sites, whereas the CF:CS model predicted some values above 150 years. The SiO2 content decreased in accordance with the LOI increase in all cores analyzed and such inverse relationship was also tracked in the SiO2–LOI curves of historical trends. The SiO2–LOI concentration fluctuations in sites S1 and S3 also coincided with some Cu and Cr inputs in the drainage systems. - Highlights: • Comparative evaluation of the excess 210Pb CF:CS and CRS models. • Superior performance of the CRS model for evaluating sedimentation rates. • Superior performance of the CRS model for chronological applications. • Use of SiO2–LOI concentration fluctuations for indicating heavy metal releases
Availability note (English)
Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apradiso.2014.06.012Additional details
Identifiers
- DOI
- 10.1016/j.apradiso.2014.06.012;
- PII
- S0969-8043(14)00240-1;
Publishing Information
- Journal Title
- Applied Radiation and Isotopes
- Journal Volume
- 92
- Journal Issue
- Complete
- Journal Page Range
- p. 58-72
- ISSN
- 0969-8043
- CODEN
- ARISEF
INIS
- Country of Publication
- United Kingdom
- Country of Input or Organization
- International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
- INIS RN
- 46103033
- Subject category
- S36: MATERIALS SCIENCE;
- Descriptors DEI
- AGE ESTIMATION; ALUMINIUM OXIDES; BRAZIL; CALCIUM OXIDES; CHEMICAL COMPOSITION; COMPARATIVE EVALUATIONS; CONCENTRATION RATIO; FLUCTUATIONS; IRON OXIDES; LEAD 210; MAGNESIUM OXIDES; MANGANESE OXIDES; PHOSPHORUS OXIDES; POTASSIUM OXIDES; SEDIMENTS; SILICON OXIDES; SODIUM OXIDES; SPECIES DIVERSITY; TITANIUM OXIDES
- Descriptors DEC
- ALKALI METAL COMPOUNDS; ALKALINE EARTH METAL COMPOUNDS; ALPHA DECAY RADIOISOTOPES; ALUMINIUM COMPOUNDS; BETA DECAY RADIOISOTOPES; BETA-MINUS DECAY RADIOISOTOPES; CALCIUM COMPOUNDS; CHALCOGENIDES; DEVELOPING COUNTRIES; DIMENSIONLESS NUMBERS; EVALUATION; EVEN-EVEN NUCLEI; HEAVY NUCLEI; IRON COMPOUNDS; ISOTOPES; LATIN AMERICA; LEAD ISOTOPES; MAGNESIUM COMPOUNDS; MANGANESE COMPOUNDS; NUCLEI; OXIDES; OXYGEN COMPOUNDS; PHOSPHORUS COMPOUNDS; POTASSIUM COMPOUNDS; RADIOISOTOPES; SILICON COMPOUNDS; SODIUM COMPOUNDS; SOUTH AMERICA; TITANIUM COMPOUNDS; TRANSITION ELEMENT COMPOUNDS; VARIATIONS; YEARS LIVING RADIOISOTOPES
Optional Information
- Copyright
- Copyright (c) 2014 Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam, The Netherlands, All rights reserved.