Published October 2013 | Version v1
Journal article

Assessment of radioactive pollution around a fertilizer factory complex in the North-Eastern part of Bangladesh

  • 1. Nuclear Safety and Radiation Control Division, Bangladesh Atomic Energy Commission, 4 Kazi Nazrul Islam Avenue, Ramna, Dhaka (Bangladesh)
  • 2. Department of Physics, Jahangirnagar University, Savar, Dhaka (Bangladesh)
  • 3. International Affairs Division, Bangladesh Atomic Energy Commission, Dhaka (Bangladesh)

Description

The activity concentrations of soil, water and fertilizer samples were determined by using high-resolution gamma spectrometry (HPGe detector: 40% relative efficiency) with a PC-based MCA system. The samples were collected from the area of a urea fertilizer factory, lagoon and Shitalakhya river in Narsingdi, Bangladesh. The activity concentrations of 226Ra ranged from 3.16 ± 0.32 to 10.28 ± 0.55 Bq.kg-1, 1.22 ± 0.41 to 7.36 ± 0.42 Bq.L-1 and 3.55 ± 0.33 to 90.65 ± 3.17 Bq.kg-1 for soil, water and fertilizer samples, respectively. The 232Th activity concentrations ranged from 4.89 ± 0.45 to 15.82 ± 0.45 Bq.kg-1, 1.21 ± 0.06 to 8.59 ± 0.37 Bq. L-1 and 4.76 ± 0.25 to 26.38 ± 1.40 Bq.kg-1 for soil, water and fertilizer samples, respectively. The 40K activity concentrations ranged from 24.96 ± 0.23 to 60.49 ± 0.56 Bq.kg-1, 7.48 ± 0.53 to 35.48 ± 0.24 Bq.L-1 and 3.55 ± 0.05 to 3051.71 ± 19.53 Bq.kg-1 for these samples, respectively. The radium equivalent activity, the hazard indices, the gamma activity concentration index, the indoor absorbed dose rate and the corresponding annual effective dose were estimated for the potential radiological hazard of the collected samples. The calculated values of the representative level index values (Iγr) for all samples of the study area are lower than unity except the MOP sample. The activity ratios were also measured. These values are compared with reported values for other countries of the world. The results of the comparison studies show that the radioactivity concentrations and other radioactive indices of the samples of the study area are below the internationally accepted maximum permissible values. Therefore, this region is safe from any radiation hazard and no significant radiological threat was observed to the population of the study area. (authors)

Availability note (English)

Available from doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/radiopro/2013074

Additional details

Identifiers

Publishing Information

Journal Title
Radioprotection
Journal Volume
48
Journal Issue
no.4
Journal Page Range
p. 575-591
ISSN
0033-8451
CODEN
RAPRBA

Optional Information

Notes
48 refs.